'Excessive' use of face-down restraint in mental health hospitals

 
Demonstration of face-down restraint Medical director Tim Kendall in a demonstration of the technique

The government is considering a ban on the use of face-down restraint in English mental health hospitals.

The move follows figures which show the controversial technique being used hundreds of times a year in some trusts - a level described by a health minister as "shocking" and apparently "excessive".

Research by the mental health charity Mind finds that some mental health trusts no longer use face-down restraint because it is considered too dangerous and traumatic.

But figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that two mental health trusts employ the procedure two or three times a day.

The Northumberland, Tyne and Wear trust used face-down restraint 923 times in 2011-12. Southern Health trust, based in Southampton, used it 810 times. Between them, the two institutions account for almost half of all the face-down restraint revealed in the figures.

However, a number of the 54 mental health trusts approached were not able to provide figures on restraint despite a statutory requirement to document and review every episode.

Health minister Norman Lamb has said he is "very interested" in "just banning face-down restraint".

Naomi Ball: "You're terrified anyway. It just makes you feel more scared"

"If that is possible, it should be done," he told the BBC. Mr Lamb has also ordered a "specific investigation" into the use of face-down restraint in Northumberland and Southampton.

"I want answers from them about their use of restraint and I want them to address what appears to be a very considerable excessive use of restraint."

In a statement, the Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust said it only used the safest and most proportionate response when patients posed a risk to themselves or others.

"Due to the specialist nature of a number of our services such as our forensic services, the trust cares for some of the most complex and challenging patients from all over the country, which means that the figures may be higher when comparing to areas without such specialist services."

Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust said its staff were "trained to assess each situation and use the most appropriate form of restraint in each case".

The use of restraint

  • Healthcare staff have a duty of care to act in the patient's best interests
  • Nice guidelines state that when people in hospital for mental health care need to be controlled or restrained, this should only be done by trained staff
  • And restraint techniques should only be used "as a last resort, using minimum force and making sure that the person is safe"
  • Hospital policies typically say restraint will only be used if it is believed necessary to prevent harm to the person
  • Must be proportionate to the likelihood and seriousness of harm
  • Physical restraint involves one or more staff members holding or moving the person, or otherwise blocking their movement

"The restraint techniques we use are based on the best evidence available, and are designed to minimise discomfort and distress to patients and also to our staff."

Mental health service user Naomi Ball, from Dudley in the West Midlands, says she has endured physical restraint many times.

"It's totally dehumanising and degrading because all control has been taken away from you. You are pinned to the floor face down, you are terrified anyway, and it just makes you feel more scared," she said.

"You're supposed to be building up trust with the staff, but the way it's done quite often means that that trust is broken completely - and if you're scared and paranoid anyway it just feeds into that and makes it a lot worse."

The mental health charity Mind is calling upon government to "introduce an end to face-down physical restraint in all healthcare settings urgently".

In a report they say it is shocking that there have been 13 restraint-related deaths of people detained under the Mental Health Act since the death of David "Rocky" Bennett in 1998. Eight of those occurred in a single year (2011).

An independent inquiry found that Mr Bennett died as a direct result of prolonged face-down physical restraint and the amount of force used by staff at a medium secure mental health unit.

Tim Kendall experienced face-down restraint himself

"[It is] unacceptable that successive governments have neglected to take action, failed to establish national standards for the use of physical restraint in England and to introduce accredited training for healthcare staff," said Mind.

Among the English mental health trusts which have banned the use of face-down restraint is Sheffield Health and Social Care. Medical director Professor Tim Kendall is also a member of the committee currently reviewing NHS guidance on the use of restraint.

"We have taken a very determined step to stop using face-down restraint at the trust entirely and we haven't had any problems - none at all," Prof Kendall says.

"It has had a very positive effect and in fact has reduced our use of [other types of] restraint by 50-60%."

Most physical restraint 2011-12

Name of trust Times used

Source: Mind (6/54 trusts did not record this information)

Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys

3,346

Lancashire Care

3,018

Southern Health

3,003

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear

2,660

Birmingham and Solihull

2,043

North Staffordshire Combined

1,626

Cheshire and Wirral

1,538

Leeds and York Partnerships

1,525

5 Boroughs Partnership

1,415

Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber

1,393

Mersey Care

1,347

Kent and Medway

1,269

Most face-down restraint 2011-12

Name of trust Times used

Source: Mind (27/54 trusts did not record this information)

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear

923

Southern Health

810

Oxford Health

225

Kent and Medway

192

Pennine Care

175

Dorset Healthcare University

125

Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber

123

Somerset Partnership

121

South West Yorkshire Partnership

117

Black Country Partnership

106

North Staffordshire Combined

102

Cornwall Partnership

85

Cheshire and Wirral

73

 
Mark Easton, Home editor Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 373.

    Restraint can at times be absolutely necessary that is for sure but?

    When people in the streets fighting after having to much to drink or just simply being violent have more fundamental rights and protections, including repeat offenders, than those sectioned mental health you do have to question our countries archaic systems that punish the already venerable, yet allows others to reign free?

  • Comment number 372.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 371.

    Re: 369 Have your say Rejected.

    Quote: "There is another way..."
    ::
    Would you care to explain this other way.... that presumably works all the time, in every situation and with every type of patient - no matter the cause or state of their health problem at that time, and having total disregard for staffing levels & other patients/clients!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 370.

    :Lets make load of Money lock people up!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 369.

    For once I will defend the Gov. this has nothing to do with Gov. it is Mind research, a MH charity calling for this ban on face-down restraints. Which I agree with as I have spent several years using restraints which don't involve holding ppl face down. Anyone who says there is no other way has either never worked in the setting or only used C&R type restraints. There is another way...

 

Comments 5 of 373

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

Programmes

  • A tankHARDtalk Watch

    The West looks 'really weak' against a 'power drunk' Russia, says a senior Ukrainian diplomat

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.