'Plebgate' and policing the police

Andrew Mitchell on his bike Andrew Mitchell denied calling officers "plebs" but did apologise for swearing

It is interesting that Sir Hugh Orde, spokesperson for top cops in England and Wales, should respond to the "plebgate" fall-out by suggesting the time may have come for an independent police ombudsman such as they have in Northern Ireland.

Three senior police officers have been criticised for apparently giving a false account of a meeting with the former cabinet minister Andrew Mitchell following the incident at Downing Street. Their meeting had been secretly recorded by Mitchell.

What makes this affair so troubling for the police service is less that individual officers may have lied - although that is clearly toxic in itself - but the suggestion that when entrusted with investigating wrong-doing, chief constables did not take appropriate action.

The IPCC is the independent body specifically set up to ensure the police don't abuse their powers and cover-up their own wrong-doing. Its deputy chair Deborah Glass is saying quite clearly that chief constables were mistaken in not pursuing their officers for allegedly trying to stitch up the Conservative MP Andrew Mitchell.

Start Quote

The question of whether institutions can be trusted to police themselves is a theme of our age”

End Quote

With the home secretary also raising the question of trust, this row threatens to inflict further damage to public confidence in the police.

Indeed, Downing Street has warned of just that.

"Incidents such as this do bring people to question their trust in the police," a Number 10 spokesman said on Wednesday.

And Policing Minister Damian Green has spoken of how the "corrupt behaviour" of a small minority of police officers could have a "corrosive effect on the reputation" of them all and undermine justice.

The chief constables involved point out that they initiated the investigation and had wanted the IPCC to conduct it independently.

Deborah Glass: ''The evidence indicates an issue of honesty and integrity''

However, rightly or wrongly, they were trusted to deal with the matter appropriately, and now they find themselves accused of not taking firm enough action.

The senior officers will put their side of the story in front of the home affairs select committee next week, but the question is bound to be asked - did they act in the best interest of the public or the best interest of their police force?

Their decision not to take action against the officers, in the face of strong evidence of misbehaviour at the least, will be seen in the context of other police scandals in which accusations were made of an institutional cover-up: recent revelations about the Hillsborough tragedy, the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes and the death of Ian Tomlinson.

The question of whether institutions can be trusted to police themselves is a theme of our age - bankers, MPs, newspapers. But chief constables know that their legitimacy is at stake if the public lose confidence.

As the principle ascribed to Robert Peel puts it: "The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions."

The "plebgate" affair and its aftermath would appear to put that founding principle in some jeopardy.

Mark Easton Article written by Mark Easton Mark Easton Home editor

Savile: 'How could this be allowed to happen?'

Today's investigation into Jimmy Savile reveals how his criminal behaviour "was facilitated by ministers or civil servants".

Read full article

More on This Story


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 754.

    753. AWPR (contd)

    I didn't say plebs,
    Don't be mucking
    Around with what I said
    I didn't say plebs
    I just said *******
    Under my breath instead

  • rate this

    Comment number 753.

    I am a Tory whip
    And I ride a butcher's bike
    I like to take a trip
    Rather than take a hike
    I never like to dismount
    Until my journey's end
    And if I'm told to dismount
    It drives me round the bend
    Open the gate, the big wide gate
    The side gate will not do
    Do it quick now don't be late
    Or I'll lose my rag with you

  • rate this

    Comment number 752.

    #751 - I did of course mean criminal arrests.

  • rate this

    Comment number 751.

    #750.I guess the trouble here is that the investigation was fed to the media by police contacts.Police were then implicated in a conspiracy resulting in criminal charges.Police federation representatives are accused of misrepresenting the truth to the media. The IPCC then question Police honesty and integrity.So, this ceased being an "internal" matter as of the evening of the first offence.

  • rate this

    Comment number 750.

    Talk about politicizing the police. If I were an employer, I would expect to be able to carry out my own investigation into whether an employee has done wrong or not and if I felt an employee had not warranted a disciplinary hearing, then the matter should be dropped, not picked up by politicians and the media. What has happened is near to breaking the data protection act as well.


Comments 5 of 754


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • BooksNew novels

    BBC Culture takes a look at ten new books to read in March


  • A robot holding a table legClick Watch

    The robots who build flat-pack furniture - teaching machines to work collaboratively

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.