Fuel duty share 'could fix potholes and roads'


A share of fuel duty could help with the £12bn repair bill for Britain's roads, as Mike Sergeant reports

Related Stories

The government should spend £1bn a year from the money it collects in fuel duty to fix potholes and crumbling roads, the body that represents councils in England and Wales has said.

The Local Government Association says taking 2p from the fuel duty of 57.95p per litre could clear a "backlog".

Roads are only being "patched up" under current funding levels, it argues.

Ministers say £24bn is being spent on roads in 2010-21, with an extra £200m in 2014 available for potholes.


Start Quote

We should be careful about ring-fencing anything, as it could lead to central government looking to plug the gaps in revenue with higher taxes elsewhere”

End Quote John O'Connell Director of the TaxPayers' Alliance

The LGA, which represents more than 350 councils in England and the 22 Welsh councils through the Welsh LGA, said £12bn was needed to tackle the "backlog of road repairs".

It said new investment in road maintenance should come from existing fuel duty revenue and not by increasing the rate itself.

In Scotland, councils spend more than £1,600 a day on compensation for drivers whose cars have been damaged by potholes, it recently emerged.

Figures obtained by the Scottish Conservatives under Freedom of Information laws earlier this year revealed that a total of £584,745 was paid out to drivers in 2013.

Scotland's local authority umbrella group Cosla said at the time that councils had to take action to tackle potholes despite falling budgets.

In Northern Ireland, the Department of Regional Development spent £120m in 2011-2012 on resurfacing roads and footways, which included patching up potholes.

'Deteriorating network'

Fuel duty contributes more than £33bn a year to the UK Treasury and has been frozen at its current price since 2011.

Councillor Peter Box, chairman of the LGA's economy and transport board, said councils were "trapped in an endless cycle of patching up our deteriorating network".

He said: "Tackling this ever-growing national repair bill must be a priority and the government can do this by injecting an extra £1bn a year into roads maintenance - funded by investing two pence a litre from existing fuel duty.

"Motorists pay billions to the Treasury each year in fuel duty when they fill up their car at the pumps only to then have to drive on roads that are decaying after decades of underfunding. They deserve roads fit for the 21st Century."

A Treasury spokesman said: "At Budget we announced the £200m Pothole Fund for local authorities, to fix a potential three million potholes..."

He said the £24bn being spent on the road network between 2010 and 2021 was "the biggest investment" since the 1970s.

Pothole Road repairs costs have risen by £1.5bn to £12bn in the last year, the LGA said

The Treasury added it had been a "major priority" of the government to freeze fuel duty.

"As a result of action since 2011, petrol will be nearly 20p a litre cheaper by the end of the Parliament than it otherwise would have been, and a typical motorist will save £680 in total by 2015-16," the spokesman said.

John O'Connell, director of the Taxpayers' Alliance, which campaigns for lower taxes, urged caution on the LGA plan.

"We should be careful about ring-fencing anything, as it could lead to central government looking to plug the gaps in revenue with higher taxes elsewhere," he said.

"There are pressures on council budgets but they have to work harder to cut out wasteful spending, so they can get potholes fixed without taking even more taxpayers' money."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 881.

    Vehicle excise duty used to be called the road fund licence until it was seen as a large pot of money to be raided by the treasury. The problem is that the treasury do not like hypothecation of taxes-the motorist is a cash cow. The tax taken from motorists should first be used to pay for road repairs and new roads and only then should the surplus go into general taxartion.

  • rate this

    Comment number 880.

    It's impossible to debate the dishonesty of the government's position while every comment containing public spending figures gets censored. HYS is a waste of time.

  • rate this

    Comment number 879.

    877. DevilsAdvocate

    Damage to the road surface is in direct proportion to the weight of the vehicle, but generally larger vehicles can carry a significantly large weight proportionately. If you reduce the size of the goods vehicles on the road then you have to increase the number, causing at least as much damage but usually more.

  • rate this

    Comment number 878.

    I am sure if any party made it policy to repair the exisiting roads in stead of building new ones they could be on to an electoral winner. What would be amazing if they stuck to their policy for at least e few weeks. The roads in the UK are dire. Some roads have not been touched for decades. I have been on roads running through jungles in better condition.

  • rate this

    Comment number 877.

    697. Claused
    5TH JULY 2014 - 18:08
    How many of you have understood that the heavier the vehicle, the bigger the risk of highway damage including potholes.

    Easy to ask for more council tax and government subsidy for our roads, why don't we have a highway weight limit for all vehicles of 30 tonnes.
    EU won't allow it, we have to adapt to their bigger truck rules,


Comments 5 of 881


More UK stories


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.