Tory 'head bangers' have won on human rights, says Nick Clegg

 

Nick Clegg said there was "an extreme view taking root in the heart of the Conservative Party"

Related Stories

Nick Clegg has launched an attack on Conservative plans to limit the power of the European Court of Human Rights.

He accused David Cameron of lining up "with Vladimir Putin and other tyrants around the world by tearing up our long tradition of human rights".

Tory "extremists" - or "head bangers" - had won out over moderates like Ken Clarke and Dominic Grieve, sacked in this week's reshuffle, he claimed.

Ex-Attorney General Mr Grieve is said to have warned against the change.

BBC Political Editor Nick Robinson said Downing Street had rejected any suggestion that the purpose of Mr Cameron's reshuffle was "to clear the decks for an assault on the European Court of Human Rights and says no final decision has been taken on what will be in the Conservative manifesto".

Under the Conservative proposals, the UK Parliament will decide what constitutes a breach of human rights.

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said a report written by a working group of Conservative lawyers predicts the so-called British Bill of Rights could force changes in the way the Strasbourg court operates.

line
Analysis

By Nick Robinson, BBC Political Editor

Who will rid me of this troublesome court?

That's the question David Cameron badly wants an answer to before the next election.

Read more from Nick

line

But it also acknowledges that it could lead to the UK being expelled from the 47-member Council of Europe, which aims to uphold human rights across the continent.

Mr Grieve had warned his colleagues that the idea was a plan for "a legal car crash with a built-in time delay", Nick Robinson said.

The former Attorney General argued that it was an "incoherent" policy to remain a signatory to the European Convention of Human Rights but to refuse to recognise the rulings of the court which enforces it.

Speaking on his weekly LBC radio phone-in, Nick Clegg said he had been "blindsided" by the announcement, which he said revealed the true motive behind Mr Cameron's cabinet reshuffle.

"It's nothing to do with gender balance. It's all to do with the death knell of the reasonable internationalism of people like Ken Clarke," said the deputy prime minister.

"I think the head bangers have now won. They are now saying, in effect, that the Conservative Party are turning their back on a long British tradition of upholding human rights across the world.

"What on earth are we going to say to the dictators in Belarus, to Vladimir Putin, if we do as the Conservatives now appear to recommend, which is to basically say we are going to stamp our little feet and not abide by binding, international human rights practices and conventions?"

'Sense of direction'

The battle to deport radical cleric Abu Qatada and attempts to remove foreign criminals have led to clashes between ministers and the Strasbourg-based court.

In 2012, Mr Cameron warned that the concept of human rights was being "distorted" and "discredited" by controversial decisions in Europe.

Nick Robinson said Downing Street had said no final decision had been taken, but he understood it was planned as a centre-piece of David Cameron's Conservative Party conference speech this autumn.

European Court of Human Rights A European Court of Human Rights ruling on votes for prisoners angered some MPs

The Conservatives cannot act in this Parliament because their Liberal Democrat coalition partners are strongly committed to the convention.

Conservative Justice Secretary Chris Grayling told BBC Radio 4's The World at One on Wednesday: "We will produce our full package in due course but ahead of the election and in time for our election manifesto.

"We will curtail the role of the European Convention on Human Rights in the UK. We will replace Labour's Human Rights Act (enshrining the convention in British law).

"We will have a balance of rights and responsibilities in our law , which I think is very important, and we will have a Supreme Court that is supreme. That gives a very clear sense of direction, of the big change which is what I think we need."

Labour's shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan called on the government to publish Dominic Grieve's advice on the role of the European Court of Human Rights.

"It is now clear that David Cameron sacked Dominic Grieve as he didn't like the advice he was receiving from an experienced lawyer who knew that the Tory's half-baked plans would leave our international standing in tatters," he said.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -24

    Comment number 1471.

    The trouble with the ECHR is that it only takes into account the so called rights of the individual and never the rights of those it affects directly or indirectly and in doing so many believe it to be not in our interest to be party to this system of justice.Parliament is not the place to decide on our human rights as it is there that the laws are made and those same laws can take away our rights

  • rate this
    +20

    Comment number 649.

    Our rights in the UK were gained over centuries, reinforced by the Courts supporting the rights of the individual. This was a very different from much of the Continent where despotic regimes held sway until much later. We simply do not need the ECHR in the same way, and particularly when it over-rules the UK courts which have given protection for so long.

  • rate this
    +169

    Comment number 299.

    A great deal of employment law and especially whistleblowing rights are tied up with the Human Rights Act. Get rid of HRA and you turn the clock back further than the 1930s. And we would be in a sorry state. As example of bad legislation I give you the zero hour contract which has thrived under this government.

  • rate this
    +19

    Comment number 235.

    Everything is in the name. How can anyone be against 'human rights'? However, we need to look beyond the name to see what is actually being done. More importantly we need democratic control over the process. I see people writing that they don't trust our MPs. Well OK vote them out then - but you cannot currently do this with the European Court. Reform and accountability are needed.

  • rate this
    +66

    Comment number 64.

    The human rights don't need changing & if this is the tories plan, everyone should be afraid, very afraid.
    What the human rights legislation does need is to be balanced by a human responsibilities act which basically states that people have these rights as long as they fulfil their human responsibilities. Keep them you're entitled to the rights, break the responsibilities and you lose the rights

 

Comments 5 of 8

 

More UK Politics stories

RSS

Features

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Sunflowers.Show your colours

    Submit photos of your colourful life for a chance to be featured on BBC Travel

Programmes

  • Man dancingClick Watch

    Searching for the DNA of dance music – the quest to find the perfect party anthem

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.