Strasbourg payout ruling due on jail vote ban

Man looking out of prison

Related Stories

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is due to rule on whether prisoners who have been denied the vote should get compensation.

The case concerns 10 men serving sentences in Scottish prisons who claim their human rights were breached when they were not allowed to vote.

In 2004 the ECHR said that a blanket ban on prisoners voting was unlawful.

But successive UK governments have not complied with this ruling.

The claimants - some of whom are convicted sex offenders - argue that their human rights were breached after they were not allowed to take part in the 2009 European elections.


If the prisoners' claims succeed, the government will have to pay them compensation, and will also face the prospect of making pay-outs in hundreds of similar cases that are also before the court.

In 2004 the ECHR in Strasbourg ruled that a UK blanket ban on prisoners voting was unlawful after it received a claim from convicted killer John Hirst.

Seven years later, MPs voted to keep the ban on prisoner voting - excluding those on remand - despite the ECHR's repeated calls for the UK to comply with its original ruling.

Convicted prisoners in the UK are banned from voting on the basis that they have forfeited that right by breaking the law and going to jail.

'Increasingly frustrated'

Last December a cross-party committee of MPs concluded that prisoners serving a jail term of a year or less could be entitled to vote - but this was never made law.

BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said: "Strasbourg has grown increasingly frustrated at the failure of ministers - under both Labour and the coalition - to comply with the ruling."

Prime Minister David Cameron has previously said that inmates will not be given the right to vote under his government, and said that the idea made him feel "physically sick".

Last October convicted murderers Peter Chester and George McGeoch lost a bid at the Supreme Court to win prisoners the right to vote in light of the ECHR's original 2004 ruling.

Mr Cameron described that particular decision as "a great victory for common sense".

More on This Story

Related Stories

More UK stories


Features & Analysis

  • A very clever little girlBrain gain

    Why are people getting better at intelligence tests?

  • Don Roberto Placa Quiet Don

    The world's worst interview - with one of the loneliest men on Earth

  • Welsh society plaqueDistant valley

    How St David's Day is marked in one community far from Wales

  • A reveller attends celebrations to mark the 450th anniversary of the city of Rio de Janeiro - 1 March 2015Partying in the streets

    Rio de Janeiro marks 450 years since it was founded

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.