RBS shuts care homes to save money in Canterbury

 
Elderly woman Elderly people at the Oldroyd House in Canterbury have been given three months notice

Ninety-two-year-old Lucy Clancey has lived at Oldroyd House in Canterbury for the past six years and she likes it there.

She likes the home, her fellow residents and the staff.

Lucy expected to be able to spend the rest of her days here but two weeks ago she - along with her fellow residents - was handed a letter by the owners - the Royal Bank of Scotland Care Homes Foundation - giving her three months notice.

The Canterbury home is one of three owned by the RBS Foundation - the other two are in Harrogate and Torquay.

Hard to move

The charity provides homes for pensioners of the bank, although residents are charged the market rate of between £500 and £700 a week.

Dr Roz Altman from Saga warns that moving elderly people can seriously affect them. Many who are forced to move don't live for long in their new accommodation.

In a statement RBS said: "A major problem is that the homes are too small and although they meet regulatory standards, they do not meet the standards currently expected in the market.

"The homes are not purpose built and their poor configuration contributes to the high running costs.

"Future maintenance costs of the homes are likely to be high."

Care costs

Start Quote

"We understand that the closure is upsetting for both the residents and for staff, and are committed to doing everything possible to support them ”

End Quote RBS statement

They went on to say: "The trustees have been concerned about the continued financial losses and low occupancy rates within the three care homes operated by the charity.

"We understand that the closure is upsetting for both the residents and for staff, and are committed to doing everything possible to support them."

Campaigners dispute the fact that the homes aren't fit for purpose, pointing out all were rated excellent by the Care Quality Commission at their last inspection.

This isn't an isolated problem though - and Britain has an ageing population. More than 400,000 people in England live in care homes.

Elderly resident of a care home There is concern about the cost of care as Britain's ageing population increases

Half of people over 65 can expect care costs of up to £20,000. One in 10 could currently experience costs of over £100,000.

Care for the elderly is in the spotlight with the publication on Monday 11 July of the Dilnot report, looking into how the government should fund care in the longer term.

Lucy Clancey and her fellow residents though have a more pressing problem in the short term - finding a new care home.

 
Louise Stewart Article written by Louise Stewart Louise Stewart Political editor, South East

South East interest in English devolution after Scottish referendum

BBC South East political editor discusses calls for more English devolution following the Scottish referendum.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    Its totally ridiculous to say that the home is too small (registered for 26 people) Its the perfect size for the people living there. Most older people do not want to live in a home with 100 other people. I run a home for 22 residents in a non purpose built building, charging the same kind of fees and we are totally financially viable. Its outrageous that RBS can do this and get away with it.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 8.

    In addition to the above comments, the Trustees of the RBS Foundation are failing to respond fully to questions being raised about the issue, despite undertaking to do so in their initial Statement. This leaves one with the distinct impression that the consultation period which they instigated was just a sham, in that they were determined to proceed with the closure of the Homes, come what may.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 7.

    This is a disgraceful way to treat our old people, RBS should be ashamed of themselves! If this is how they treat their staff god help the customers.
    People are living longer and quality care homes are in demand, so it is obvious that these homes have purposefully not been marketed.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 6.

    It is disappointing that due to a legal loophole RBS seem able to prevent a thorough expose of their lamentable approach to this situation. The very term "Trustees" would imply an overriding obligation to the interest of the residents, not to the RBS Management. It seems that these "Trustees" are not fulfilling their purpose but merely rubber stamping a financial decision from above.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    RBS here are basically getting away with murder. It is obvious that the closures are happening only because this Foundation does not fit in with their core business & they have found a way of doing away with the homes. The Trustees have come up with no arguements that stand up & the low occupancy has been manufactured by them to further their cause. RBS should be bought to account BBC please help

 

Comments 5 of 9

 

Features & Analysis

  • An ant and a humanAnts v humans

    Do all the world's ants really weigh as much as all the humans?


  • Tattooed person using tabletRogue ink

    People who lost their jobs because of their tattoos


  • Indian coupleSuspicious spouses

    Is your sweetheart playing away? Call Delhi's wedding detective


  • Civilians who had been hiding inside during gun battles manage to flee  from the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya Saturday, 21 September 2013Westgate's questions

    One year on, Kenyans await answers about the mall attack


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • GeoguessrWhere in the world...?

    Think you are a geography expert? Test your knowledge with BBC Travel’s interactive game

Programmes

  • StudentsClick Watch

    Could a new social network help tailor lessons to students’ needs and spot when they fall behind?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.