Tory MP: More grammar schools please

 
Chatham Grammar School Grammar schools still exert a powerful pull on the heartstrings of some Conservatives

Decades after the vast majority of grammar schools disappeared into history they still exert a powerful pull on the heartstrings of some Conservative MPs.

The tripartite system of grammar schools, secondary moderns and technical schools - along with the controversial 11 Plus - was the brainchild of RA Butler, Conservative President of the Board of Education in Churchill's wartime coalition.

Introducing free secondary education for all, the 1944 Education Act was by any standards a ground-breaking piece of legislation.

But the selective principle upon which that education was delivered faced mounting criticism.

Twenty years later Harold Wilson's Labour government launched a major drive towards comprehensive education.

Selective education

A battle has since continued between those who see grammar schools as beacons of academic excellence and social mobility and those who dismiss them as socially divisive institutions which reject the majority of children as academic failures at the age of 11.

It is a battle, of course, which the latter have broadly won.

There are now just 164 grammar schools left across the country including a handful in the South West.

A yearning for selective education undoubtedly endures in many Conservative breasts.

However - as David Cameron pointed out in 2007 - the governments of Margaret Thatcher and John Major did little to halt or reverse the comprehensive revolution despite having 18 years to do so.

By the 1997 election, though, enthusiasm for selection had hardened into a Conservative pledge to provide a "grammar school in every town".

But this happened to coincide with the beginning of a long period of electoral oblivion for the Tories.

Death throes?

Ten years - and five Conservative leaders - later David Cameron decided the commitment to grammar schools was part of the problem rather than the solution.

He dismissed the debate about an educational system largely in its death throes by the time he was born as "pointless" and a "chain around the party's neck".

Gareth Johnson Conservative MP Gareth Johnson has called on the government to allow more selection

And he criticised those of his colleagues who wanted to "cling on to outdated mantras which bear no relation to the reality of life".

Despite the fury of some back-benchers - and the resignation of a shadow minister - the "grammar school in every town" policy was completely reversed.

Not only have the Conservatives dropped their commitment to build more grammars, they've also retained the absolute ban on the introduction of any further selection in the state sector.

Last week at Westminster the Conservative MP for Dartford, Gareth Johnson, called on the government to relent and allow more selection.

Talking to me on the Politics Show, Tiverton and Honiton's Neil Parish did the same:

Tiverton and Honiton's MP Neil Parish talks about the merits of grammar schools.

 
Martyn Oates, Political editor, South West Article written by Martyn Oates Martyn Oates Political editor, South West

Who paved way for NHS regional pay?

MPs debate which government opened the doors to the proposed regional pay in the NHS.

Read full article

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 1.

    I attended a Kent grammar not that long ago (I'm now 25) and I have to say that (at least some) are certainly not beacons of excellence. Due to their intake of intelligent kids they will always get good results, no matter what ineptitudes and most of the kids have had private tuition to get them through the 11+ in the first place. Kids with pushy parents will always do well no matter what system.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 2.

    To "make every one/child the same" is essentially deep socialist/communist ideology and holds back brighter kids from disadvantaged backgrounds.

    Coming from a council estate, I went to one of the roughest schools in merseyside and I got reasonable results. Had I had the opportunity to go to a grammar school I have no doubt that both my results and career prospects would have been greatly improved

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 3.

    It is NO coincidence that the most dramatic decline in Great Britain's position as a World force came after the closing of the Grammar Schools. What a stupid and farcical decision? ex New Mills Grammar School Student

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 4.

    Schools are already divided by classes (groups) for different levels of academic achievement, how is this different from division by school. Streaming by school or classes (groups) is a good thing and helps children achieve their best.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 5.

    There are unrealistic expectations forced on teachers of mixed ability classes. The teaching and learning quality improves dramatically when the children are grouped by ability. However, a child who is showing any signs of progressing beyond the streamed set should be quickly allowed to move upstream. FREE, ACCESSIBLE grammar school education would be a strong motivator to work even harder.

 

Comments 5 of 51

 

This entry is now closed for comments

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Child museumChild's play

    Should children be allowed to run wild in museums? BBC Culture investigates

Programmes

  • Going through ice across the Northwest PassageThe Travel Show Watch

    Navigating the treacherous Northwest Passage through ice and Arctic storms

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.