Army officer in fraud case 'forged wife's signature'

Robert Henry Jolleys Mr Jolleys said he did not fully explain his situation on Army documents

Related Stories

A former British Army officer accused of fraudulently claiming £220,000 to send his children to private school has admitted forging his estranged wife's signature on bank documents.

Swindon Crown Court heard Robert Henry Jolleys, 52, of Whalley, Lancashire, claimed the fees for Stoneyhurst College for nearly a decade.

He admitted removing his wife Judith's name from their joint account.

The former lieutenant colonel denies 11 counts of fraud, deception and forgery.

Mr Jolleys, who is known as Henry, told the court he removed his wife's name from their account as she had mounting debts and he did not want her to spend the money.

He claims he was not deceiving the Army when he claimed the school fees to send his three sons to the Lancashire school because he was their "primary carer" instead of his wife.

Living apart

Mr Jolleys maintained he was not deliberately misleading the Army but he had not fully explained his family circumstances on the declarations.

It is alleged he claimed £218,094.11 in continuing education allowance between January 2002 and December 2009.

The court heard he was legitimately claiming the allowance until 2002 when he separated from his wife.

He is accused of then not informing his superiors of the split, meaning his circumstances had changed and he may no longer have been eligible for the allowance.

The court was told Mr Jolleys submitted paperwork in August 2005 and March 2006 which stated he was "married accompanied" - meaning his wife was living with him in married quarters provided by the Army.

At this point, however, he was living in the quarters in Harrogate, North Yorkshire, and she was living and working in London.

He could have continued claiming the school fees allowance if he could have proved he was the primary carer for his three children, rather than sharing arrangements with his wife.

He told the court he looked after the children and that his wife wanted no responsibility for childcare, apart from being able to visit.

"From 2002 she made very clear that if I didn't take the children and assume responsibility for them they would have to go into care," he said.

The trial was adjourned until Tuesday.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More England stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • SyedTanks instead of toys

    Lyse Doucet on the plight of children in Syria and Gaza


  • Silhouette of manSuper-shy

    Why do Germany's super-rich so often keep their heads down?


  • Gin drinkerMother's ruin

    The time was gin was full of sulphuric acid and turpentine


  • The two sisters in their bakery'Must be mad'

    Why two Spanish sisters started a bakery in a desert


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • EscaladeBling's the thing

    The ostentatious Cadillac Escalade cruises into 2015 with fuel-gulping gusto

Programmes

  • The smartphones of shoppers being tracked in a storeClick Watch

    How free wi-fi can enable businesses to track our movements and learn more about us

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.