Gummer's plea to rename National Insurance

 
Ben Gummer Ben Gummer hopes to rename National Insurance

After championing transparency on your tax bill, Ben Gummer's new plan is to rename National Insurance.

Brought in by the indomitable Lloyd George in 1911, National Insurance contributions were introduced to provide insurance against illness and unemployment and it's often said that 'it pays for the health service'.

The reality, of course, is that it doesn't and that's what the MP for Ipswich wants to address.

"A sensible first step would be just to be honest about what National Insurance is, which is a tax. It's a tax on your earnings and we should just be plain about that.

"Since 1911 the the link between welfare and benefits and National Insurance has been broken and now it just goes into the pot like everything else does."

Mr Gummer wants National Insurance to be called the Earnings Tax and he has proposed the change in the House of Commons.

National Insurance is paid by all workers aged between 16 and retirement age. We pay 12% per cent on earnings between £149 and £797 a week; after that you pay an extra 2%.

Start Quote

It walks like a tax, it quacks like a tax and we should call it a tax”

End Quote Ben Gummer MP (Con) Ipswich

Mr Gummer says there is hardly any difference between National Insurance and Income Tax.

"I think we should be straighter as politicians with tax payers about how we raise money from them and how we spend it and a little sign, a little bit of movement in that direction would just be being straight about what National Insurance is, by calling it a tax.

"It walks like a tax, it quacks like a tax and we should call it a tax."

Merger

There are suspicions though, that the move might in the longer term lead to a rolling together of National Insurance Contributions and Income Tax.

Pensions are subject to Income Tax but not to National Insurance Contributions. Some question, if the two are merged, whether this could lead to the government increasing the taxation of pensioners.

Mr Gummer has it all in hand:"What I propose is no change in the rate, or how much people are charged, merely the name and if they were merged in the future, there should be special rates for pensioners so they don't lose out."

Could it be that Mr Gummer has the ear of the Chancellor? The budget is only weeks away...

Mr Gummer hints:"I hope the Chancellor will take it on, he's looked kindly on my projects in the past and I hope he will do so again."

 
Deborah McGurran Article written by Deborah McGurran Deborah McGurran Political editor, East of England

Rail consultation may open floodgate

The government has launched a consultation on rail services in East Anglia to ask passengers about the service they receive.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    this is just a way of reinforcing the tory message that all people that get benefits are scroungers. We pay 12 percent of our wages as an insurance policy against times when we might need some help which does not match the "something for nothing" message put out by this government.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    It's a not so subtle attempt to break the link between NI and benefits. Rightly or wrongly NI is linked with an entitlement to benefits if they are needed, even in the minds of Tory supporters. Another piece of ideological rebranding, a la the Ministry of Truth, as done with Social Security rebranded to the American vulgarism "Welfare" The War against the Poor continues..

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 4.

    Mr Gummer has it all in hand:"What I propose is no change in the rate, or how much people are charged, merely the name

    ++
    So, basically this fool wants to spend £millions of taxpayers money on administrators & new signs & stationary just changing the name of National Insurance.

    Is it no wonder so many cuts to pensioners/disabled when "experts" cut lives because so incompetent at ideas

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 3.

    But this doesn't go any way to making the system simpler. Just get rid of 'National Insurance' and increase Income Tax by the extra 12%! The government then earns an identical amount through tax, but from a worker's point of view, it's much easier to manage because it's all just one tax!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 2.

    Can't argue about renaming the tax.....but wonder if it's the first step towards adding a tax to pensioners' incomes.....no NI payable on pension income currently ?

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

Programmes

  • An ECG (electrocardiogram)Click Watch

    The wearable technology which could allow you to pay for goods with your heartbeat

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.