Legoland Windsor fined after worker fell from ride

Legoland entrance The worker broke his shoulder and several ribs but has since recovered

Related Stories

The owner of Legoland in Berkshire has been fined £23,200 and told to pay £12,115 in costs after a worker fell from a ride while carrying out repairs.

Reading Magistrates' Court heard the 42-year-old man fell more than 3m (9ft) as he tried to remove two damaged roller-coaster trains from a track.

Merlin Attractions Operations Ltd admitted two breaches of health and safety regulations on 1 June 2011.

But the firm maintained "a prosecution was wholly unjustified".

Merlin Attractions Operations, based in Poole, Dorset, said it "chose to plead guilty and draw a line under this incident".

The court heard the worker, from Bracknell, broke his shoulder and several ribs but has since returned to work.

'Injury avoidable'

He was one of a team removing the damaged parts from the Dragon Coaster ride at the Windsor park and fell when he stepped on to a section of walkway that had been replaced but not secured.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that a risk assessment by the company stated that harnesses and lanyards should have been used, but this was not followed.

HSE Inspector Karen Morris said the injury had been avoidable.

She said: "It is quite unacceptable that the day after someone was injured in this way, more work is carried out to complete the task, and allowed to continue in the same way with inadequate fall protection or fall prevention measures in place.

"The dangers of falls from height are well known, and Merlin Attractions Operations Ltd was placing employees at unnecessary risk."

A spokeswoman for Legoland Windsor said the health and safety of employees and visitors was its "primary concern".

She said an internal investigation showed the park had "taken all reasonable steps to ensure the safety" of workers but that the HSE had "taken no account of our excellent safety record, procedures and culture".

"This was in our opinion an unfortunate accident for which a prosecution was wholly unjustified," she said.

"Given the circumstances we believe this is neither fair nor reasonable.

"However, the regulations in question give little scope for any defence and therefore the company chose to plead guilty and draw a line under this incident."

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

BBC Berkshire

Weather

Reading

Min. Night 17 °C

Features & Analysis

  • Man holding lipWitch hunt

    The country where a writer accused of blasphemy must run


  • Espresso cupNews quiz

    Which city serves the strongest cup of coffee?


  • Malaysian plane wreckage in UkraineFlight risk

    How odd is it to have three plane crashes in eight days?


  • Irvine WelshDeaf ears

    Five famous Scots who can't vote in the Scottish referendum


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Canada.Hidden rail trip

    Canada's tiny, two-car shuttle is a train lover's dream with scenic views

Programmes

  • Leader of Hamas Khaled MeshaalHARDtalk Watch

    BBC exclusive: Hamas leader on the eagerness to end bloodshed in Gaza

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.