Leicestershire councils vote on big budget cuts

Protest at city hall The city council meeting attracted a group of protesters concerned at cuts to homeless centres

Related Stories

Leicestershire County Council is to spend more than half its current reserves over the next four years.

Councillors voted to commit £56m of the £100m fund to supporting vulnerable families, adult social care and economic development.

But the authority still approved £48m of cuts over four years, with another £30m still needing to be found.

Setting its own budget, Leicester City Council said it needed to save £9m over two years.

Adult social care is facing the brunt of the cuts - £12m in the county and nearly £4m in the city.


There were shouts of "shame" from the public gallery at Leicester's Town Hall as the budget cuts put forward by the city council executive were nodded through.

They were measured arguments, and some pretty unmeasured ones about the decisions and the impact they'll have, but in the Labour dominated chamber there was atypical general agreement with Sir Peter Soulsby's comment that "there are no good decisions - it's the best of a bad job".

The Housing Revenue budget was also approved - which will see a 3.4% rise in council house rents across Leicester from April, and a 2.6% rise in service charges.

There was more theatre at County Hall as some councillors debated their final budget before bowing out at the elections. One Labour member accused the ruling Conservatives of moving from "Victorian values to Victorian poverty".

But in county council leader Nick Rushton's first full budget, a sense of change was reflected in the move to spend over half the authority's current reserves, over the next four years.

Jobs axed

Other areas affected are services at children's centres in the city and county-wide highway maintenance.

Officials said they were facing a 10% drop in central government funding and had already made substantial backroom savings.

The county council said it had made about £25m in savings from its £356m budget this financial year.

It has lost more than 700 staff in the last three years and over the next four it is expected the equivalent of another 1,100 full-time posts will go.

The city council has already lost 500 posts and another 100 were expected to be axed.

'Vital services'

City council tax bills will rise by just under 2%, and while frozen in the county next year, will go up by 1.5% in the following three years.

Tony Donovan, chief executive of Age UK in Leicestershire, is worried about the impact of the cuts.

He said: "We have an aging society and many of these are going to need intensive support to remain in the community.

"Our experience is that many more people are going to seek the help of Age UK and other care providers and the fear is that some of those providers that are not so well resourced will find life too difficult to continue."

Leicester Mayor Sir Peter Soulsby said the city annual funding deal from government had already been cut by £75m, leaving it with a £300m budget.

"We are seeking to protect vital services for people of all ages across the city and we are keeping some £84m in the budget for adult social care.

"Cuts have to be set in the context of what are undoubtedly the harshest government funding cuts in living memory," he said.

Proposed cuts to the city's homelessness strategy - a third of the £6.6m budget - were taken off the agenda as a consultation into the changes only finished on Monday.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites



10 °C 5 °C

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • Audi R8Need for speed

    Audi unveils its fastest production car ever - ahead of its Geneva debut


  • A bicycle with a Copenhagen WheelClick Watch

    The wheel giving push bikes an extra boost by turning them into smart electric hybrids

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.