A14 toll scheme is road apartheid, claims David Ruffley

A14 Congestion on the A14 in Cambridgeshire, which MPs from Suffolk believe will cost their county dear

The proposal for a new toll road to the north of Cambridge has been widely criticised by hauliers, motoring organisations and business groups.

Now MPs are claiming that charging drivers to use the A14 will slow down East Anglia's economic recovery.

MPs from Suffolk chose a special debate at Westminster to voice their opposition to the controversial tolling plan, which was described as a congestion charge for Cambridgeshire penalising hauliers and drivers from Suffolk.

"Proposals such as this could have a negative impact on Suffolk's economy as a whole," said Peter Aldous, MP for Waveney. "If there's a toll road there should be a proper alternative but preferably no toll road at all."

Therese Coffey, MP for Suffolk Coastal, who had called the debate, said that demand was not inelastic to the toll and that it would add costs to going in and out of Suffolk.

'Double disadvantage'

She added that the market town of St Ives could be ruined by increased traffic trying to avoid the toll.

"We are concerned for our county and our region. The A14 need to be improved but users feel they already pay their share and users know other parts of the road network are fully funded. It is really rousing Suffolk," she said.

Start Quote

Suffolk hauliers are having to pay for the economic success of Cambridge”

End Quote Ben Gummer MP (Con) Ipswich

David Ruffley, MP for Bury St Edmunds, did not mince his words. "Why wasn't there greater consultation with Suffolk?" he asked. "Other A roads are not being tolled. We're now facing A road apartheid."

Ipswich MP Ben Gummer claimed the East of England was bereft of infrastructure.

"Suffolk hauliers are having to pay for the economic success of Cambridge," he argued. "We, in Felixstowe, do not have an electric link by rail and our principal road route will be tolled - it's a double disadvantage."

The scheme was defended by Roads Minister Robert Goodwill, who said it was only fair that drivers make a contribution to the £1.5bn cost. He added the benefits of the A14 upgrade would be enormous.

Alternative routes

"It carries 85,000 vehicles a day, many more than it was designed for. Congestion itself presents a cost to business efficiency. Tolls are a well-established principle.

"The government will still bear the brunt of the cost of the scheme but it is right that users should make a contribution to its construction."

He said there would be no toll plazas to maintain the flow of traffic and that alternative routes were 14 miles or so longer, so it would be more economic to stay on the road and pay the toll. If hauliers did not want to pay the toll could travel at night, when there would be no charge.

What hauliers will make of that will, no doubt, be made clear soon enough...

The first consultation period has just ended. More than 1,000 people have replied to questionnaires and 5,000 people have already attended exhibitions about the route; none of which were held in Suffolk, pointed out Ms Coffey.

Everyone agrees that to do nothing is not an option but the main objection still seems to be that out of 25 national road schemes, this is to be the only one funded by a toll.

Meanwhile Cambridgeshire's MPs were noticeable by their absence, while Suffolk's MPs said that the county's drivers would be effectively paying Cambridge's congestion charge.

Deborah McGurran Article written by Deborah McGurran Deborah McGurran Political editor, East of England

War images stop MPs in their tracks

MPs are stopped in their Westminster tracks to reflect on the issue of war thanks to an exhibition of thought provoking artwork by veterans.

Read full article


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    Obviously Mr Cameron doesn't use this part of the A14, could you see him wanting to pay a toll in addition to the road tax, and the tax on fuel he already pays to provide decent roads, he wouldn't want to pay for something again when people in other parts of the country do not have to would he?! Hopefully the voters in this part of the country will let him know what they think of it .

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    Stop building on any green field. It is an act of genocide, a crime against humanity. Deliberately starving someone somewhere in the world. Roads rails or worst housing have no ethical place being built on farm land, especially in the UK's grain belt.To do so is a crime.We have plenty of roads already, nowhere is inaccessible. Greed for speed, cheapness, or convenience is not a good enough excuse.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Why toll A14? Perhaps prejudice against Port of Felixstowe, and a wish to promote London Gateway Port at Thurrock applies in Government? Currently Felixstowe is having to pay to update both rail and road links. NO other Uk port has been expected to pay in this way. A14 users have had to put up with delays especially in the Huntingdon/Cambridge are for 10+ years. Expedite construction,lose toll!


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • StudentsBull market

    Employers are snapping up students with this desirable degree


  • 3D model of Christ the Redeemer statueClick Watch

    Using drones to 3D map the famous Brazilian landmark Christ the Redeemer

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.