Kings Mill Hospital criticised again for care standards

King's Mill Hospital The CQC criticised Kings Mill Hospital for staffing levels and patient dissatisfaction

Related Stories

A Nottinghamshire hospital criticised in the Keogh review has come under fire again for its standards of care.

Sherwood Forest Hospitals Trust has been told to improve its services at Kings Mill Hospital, in Sutton-in-Ashfield.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) carried out a surprise inspection and found five of the eight standards of quality and safety were not being met.

The Trust said it was confident it would address all the issues.

'Real concern'

The CQC visited the Trust in June and July following the Keogh review which was carried out in light of the Stafford Hospital scandal.

Sherwood's troubles

2005: The Trust starts work on a £320m private finance initiative expansion at King's Mill Hospital

September 2012: Health watchdog Monitor steps in to run the trust over concerns about its finances

October 2012: Trust chairman Tracy Doucét steps down

November 2012: True cost of the PFI agreement, initially said to be £976m, revealed to be £2bn

December 2012: Dr Foster report highlights death rate as a "warning sign"

February 2013: CQC raises concerns over number of deaths from sepsis

11 February 2013: Sir Bruce Keogh's review into death rates, launched in light of the Stafford Hospital scandal, extends to include Sherwood Forest Trust

April 2013: CQC criticises trust for prioritising money over its patients in an inspection following test errors in breast cancer treatment

June 2013: Keogh review starts

16 July 2013: Trust placed in special measures following publication of the Keogh review

17 July 2013: Independent review of operations at Newark

The review criticised the Trust for staffing levels; too many untrained nurses relative to the number of trained nurses; poor attention paid to oral hygiene and patient dissatisfaction. It was one of 11 placed in special measures.

The CQC raised its concerns in a report which said it found:

  • Examples of the trust not having effective systems in place to check the quality of its own service and manage risks.
  • Infection control guidance documents had gone past the date they should have been reviewed.
  • The equipment checklist had not been completed for four days on one ward which indicated that it had not been checked.
  • Complaints were not always being dealt with in line with the Trust's own policy.

CQC's regional director, Andrea Gordon, said: "The failings we found at Kings Mill Hospital are a real concern.

"CQC has been working to ensure the safety and wellbeing of people receiving this service and we have told the service changes need to be made."

In response, Paul O'Connor, chief executive of the Trust said it was already working to make improvements by the time of the Keogh review.

"We are confident measures have been put in place to address all findings from these reports and recognise the need to give additional attention to bring further improvements for our patients," he added.

He said measures included making the director of nursing and quality now clinical lead for complaints and clearing the complaints backlog; introducing rounds to ensure regular patient checks are carried out and a recruitment drive for more medical staff.

Last year the hospital had to review its breast cancer treatment after an error with test results for 120 women.

The CQC said it would carry out a follow-up inspection "in the near future".

More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

BBC Nottingham



Min. Night 1 °C

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • BooksNew novels

    BBC Culture takes a look at ten new books to read in March


  • TomatoesClick Watch

    The smart garden that fits inside your house and provides fresh healthy food

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.