Major engine failure caused plane crash near Wiltshire airfield
A fatal plane crash was caused by engine failure, and suitable helmets or harnesses may have reduced injuries, a report has concluded.
The flight school YAK-52 crashed while making a forced landing in Wiltshire, killing one pilot and injuring another.
Other factors were a lack of safety checks and allowing a pilot unfamiliar with the Yak-52 to attempt the landing.
The flight school failed to notice "an unprofessional and deteriorating situation", the report said.
The plane was being flown by one of the Empire Test Pilot School course tutors, an RAF test pilot, to build up his experience and development.
Alexandre Jay Parr, 40, was highly experienced but was unqualified to carry out a forced landing with this type of plane.
The pilot in command of the plane was a civilian qualified in this type of aircraft.
The Yak is an eastern European plane, so its cockpit design and operation differs from western style cockpits, the report said.
The Defence Safety Authority, which published the report, said there were multiple issues.
It highlighted the lack of documentation of flights being made and said there had been recurring malfunctions of the aircraft, but it continued to be used.
The aircraft was also procured using a series of sub-contractors.
This meant safety checks were missed, as no-one properly scrutinised the aircraft's airworthiness documents.
Speaking of the engine failure, the report said: "The cause of the engine problem currently remains unknown and may continue to be so despite an extensive technical investigation by the Air Accident Investigation Branch."
However, it added, "engine problems are not unusual n the YAK-52, which has been involved in 11 fatalities in the UK to date.
It said: "Whilst the panel was unable to conclude that the FSP (front seat pilot) would have survived had he been restrained, the panel was able to conclude that the failure of the (PIC) pilot in command's harness straps led to significant injuries that otherwise wouldn't have occurred.
"It is possible that the wearing of a suitable helmet would have mitigated injuries sustained by both of the accident crew."