AV referendum: Dividing the spoils of a bitter war

 
No to AV campaign No to AV campaigners have plenty to celebrate after winning a resounding victory

A debate that was often about the complexity of electoral systems ended in the simplest of results.

The No campaign won, overwhelmingly.

The rush to attribute blame, or grab the credit for that result, begins here.

Many Lib Dems will attribute the outcome to David Cameron who they say campaigned hard for a No vote despite agreeing not to take a leading role.

As early as February the prime minister had no qualms about reminding people Nick Clegg had once called the alternative vote a "miserable little compromise".

Relations between the coalition partners deteriorated from there, until Energy Secretary Chris Huhne confronted the prime minister in cabinet in what became a very well publicised spat.

Both Mr Huhne and the former Lib Dem leader Lord Ashdown accused the No campaign of personally targeting Nick Clegg and telling lies, something which was denied.

While some suspected the tension was carefully staged to boost Lib Dem election hopes, Mr Huhne insisted, as the results came in, relationships had grown frayed.

These moments of melodrama won the attention of journalists.

Unusual alliances

Gripping the wider public, would prove to be more difficult.

In the event much of debate was characterised by two things that tend to bore voters - bickering politicians and ferocious, sometimes obscure, battles between political campaigners.

Even committed Westminster watchers may soon struggle to recall the details of a row about a poster featuring a soldier's body armour, or the intricacies of the campaign donations.

There were moments of novelty when political opponents shared one stage.

Lib Dem Business Secretary Vince Cable and Labour leader Ed Miliband appeared together at a press conference arguing for a Yes vote. David Cameron and the former Labour home secretary Lord Reid stood side by side to make the case for a no vote.

But even these unusual alliances were unlikely to win too much attention from those not naturally drawn to politics.

Turnout

All this was played out against a backdrop of huge news stories such as the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, the death of Osama bin Laden and the royal wedding.

Despite all this, millions of people voted and even in areas where no other elections were taking place, like London, the turnout was comparable to that seen at local elections.

Those who favoured the Yes campaign will argue they were defeated by the prime minister's campaigning power, a largely hostile press and a tough opposing campaign.

They will also wonder whether people who voted against the Lib Dems in the elections might have been keen to oppose Nick Clegg's favoured electoral system at the referendum.

Those who backed a No vote will say they won the argument for the merits of the status quo, and persuaded people the alternative vote was complex and unnecessary.

The voters, of course, needed only to mark crosses on ballot papers. They did not have to explain their reasoning.

So campaigners who devoted months of their lives to this argument will never know what difference, if any, they made to the result.

 

More on This Story

Vote 2011 Vote 2011 graphic

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 346.

    I voted No because I understood the AV system and didn't like it!

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 344.

    Many people I know - and myself - voted yes. Those around me who voted no seemed to be united in their reasoning: that British people would be too thick to figure out how to complete the ballot and it would put people off voting. What a reason, eh? I can't begin to express how sad that makes me feel. Of course, there's probably some anti-Nick Clegg feeling in there too...

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 331.

    The AV supporters should stop casting around to blame someone / something for the results of this referendum. They should stop deluding themselves and face up to the fact that an overwhelming number of voters chose to remain with the present system. These voters are not gullible, are not stupid, and were entirely capable of understanding the processes / rationale of the alternative systems.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 315.

    I voted yes to AV but most of the'yes' people are being unbearably patronising! Sore losers?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 294.

    I find it offensive that some on here are saying that the "No" voters were manipulated by the Tories and the press. We are capable of making our own mind up and we voted against the proposed AV system. The Lib Dems were in favour of AV as they thought it would give them a chance of being more than also rans.

 

Comments 5 of 13

 

More UK Politics stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • MouseEscape the rat race

    Burnt out? Meet the workers who took more than a vacation - and changed their lives

Programmes

  • (File photo) A man dressed as Father Christmas with a sleigh and a reindeer Click Watch

    A website which tracks Father Christmas, plus other sites and apps to keep you entertained

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.