Work programme - not working


Standby for data which will show that the government's work programme is, well, not working. One senior Whitehall figure described it to me as a "failure"

The work programme was part of what ministers called a revolution in welfare. It paid private companies by results in order to get the long term unemployed back to work.

A minimum target was set for those firms. They should get sustainable jobs for 5 in 100 job seekers. For months there has been speculation that they will miss that figure as stories have emerged of charities and firms involved with the scheme hitting financial problems, with some going bust.

I am told that the figure - which will come out at 9.30 this morning - will, in fact, be around 3%. The 5% target was what the Treasury calls the deadweight cost. In other words, the stats will suggest, as many unemployed are getting sustainable jobs as if the Work Programme had never existed.

The government will, nevertheless, not accept that their scheme is a failure. One well placed source has claimed that it is still "on track" and here's why:

- they claim that the Work Programme is taking longer than expected to succeed but argue that the next set of figures will be better. It is, they say, taking contractors longer and, sometimes, several placements to find sustainable work for the unemployed. They point to figures released last night by ESRA - the trade body which represents the 18 prime contractors - which works with the government on the Work Programme which suggest that, since the scheme was launched in June last year, more than 200,000 people have been found a job after 800,000 attachments

Updated: Apologies for saying in the original post - now corrected - that people do not get benefit when on the Work Programme.

Ministers claim that they are meeting their "off benefit targets" and that they are saving money too. The cost of every job secured under their Work Programme is, they say, just over £2,000 compared with a cost of almost £7,500 under Labour's Future New Deal because the contractors are only paid 60% of their fee once someone is in a sustainable job: ie for six months.

Labour says that today's figures show that the government is failing the long term unemployed at a time when the numbers without work long term have risen by 200,000 over the past year.

You pays yer money and you....

Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

What a difference a day makes

In just 24 hours, Sir Malcolm Rifkind went from angry defiance to a grim-faced acceptance that he would have to quit his job as an MP and chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 382.

    I didnt say I didnt want to discuss it lefty just that it is a complete waste of time trying to discuss anything with you & your mates on the left because as we all know, the left is right and the right is wrong, lalalalalalalafingersinmyearsIcanthearyouIcanthearyouIcanthearyou.

    What I actually said is Ive got better things to waste my precious few hours on this earth doing and that remains true.

  • rate this

    Comment number 381.

    373. Steve_M-H
    I challenge your point and provide evidence that it has no foundation. The research I quote is independent and highly respected by both sides of the debate. You however call it a quango. Then you are unable to provide any evidence for your propoganda. And then finally you declare you don't wish to discuss it anymore. My advice mate. Don't post rubbish in the first place.

  • rate this

    Comment number 380.

    I'm a single mum on JSA, i have been on a work programme for 14mths,i am on my 3rd advisor,not one of them have helped me find a job,every job i have applied for i have found myself,every interview i got myself & i had 1 advisor that would take all the jobs i had job searched for & copy them for her other clients, so had to compete with her other clients, much more to say but not enough space.

  • rate this

    Comment number 379.

    I think someone stole my book on TCP/IP.

  • rate this

    Comment number 378.

    AndyC 375
    ;o)) knowingly.
    But getting bacl on topic. Would you lay out money to achieve something when not laying out any money would have achieved more. You don't need to be a 'Dragon' to figure this makes no sense. BTW I wonder what amusingly appropriate pen names we could come up with for you.
    Darth eVader? Suggestions anyone?.


Comments 5 of 382


Features & Analysis

  • Signposts showing the US and UK flagsAn ocean apart

    How British misunderstanding of the US is growing

  • Before and after shotsPerfect body

    Just how reliable are 'before and after' photos?

  • Mukesh SinghNo remorse

    Delhi bus rapist says victim shouldn't have fought back

  • A cow wearing sunglasses overlaid with the phrase 'Can't touch this'Cow row

    Thousands rally against the ban on beef in India

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • StudentsBull market

    Employers are snapping up students with this desirable degree


  • Former al-Qaeda double agent Aimen DeanHARDtalk Watch

    Islamic State is about revenge says former al-Qaeda member turned spy Aimen Dean

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.