Danny Alexander 'confident' HS2 will be within budget

 

Danny Alexander on the HS2 project: "We have set the budget and we will stick to it"

Related Stories

Treasury minister Danny Alexander has said he is "very confident" the HS2 high-speed rail project will be delivered within its £42.6bn budget.

He told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show the government was using the "same techniques" to ensure efficiency as for the 2012 London Olympics.

Supporters say the plan to link London to Manchester and Leeds will reduce journey times and boost growth.

But Labour's deputy leader Harriet Harman said costs had to be monitored.

The aim is to get trains running as fast as 250mph (400km/h) between London and Birmingham from 2026, with branches to Manchester and Leeds via Sheffield planned for 2033.

The estimated cost of the project has risen from £34.2bn to £42.6bn - plus £7.5bn for rolling stock.

'Working hard'

Mr Alexander, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, insisted this would not change, saying: "The real cost is the budget that we set out in June this year: £42.6bn. It hasn't changed at all.

"That number includes within it a significant amount of contingency.

"I'm very confident that, as we work through the project and deliver it, we will not just deliver it within that budget but, like the Olympic Stadium project, under budget too.

"That is something I'm working very, very hard to make sure happens. We are applying the same techniques we used to deliver the Olympic Park to the HS2 project."

Map showing the route of phases 1 & 2 of the proposed HS2 rail service

Mr Alexander added: "We have set that budget and we will stick to it."

For Labour, shadow chancellor Ed Balls is reported to have compared HS2 to the Millennium Dome, saying: "I think you should learn from your mistakes."

But Ms Harman played down the comments, saying Mr Balls had been asked about the Dome by a Mail on Sunday journalist and had not volunteered the comparison.

She told the Andrew Marr Show: "We absolutely support better north-south lines. We are in favour of rail infrastructure for commuters and also for long-distance travellers and freight but not at any cost.

"And what Ed Balls is saying is we have to keep a strong eye on the costs as well as on the benefits.

"It's no good the government simply complaining about people who are raising these issues. They should be addressing these issues, controlling costs and being properly analytical about the benefits that are available."

Shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint told BBC One's Sunday Politics: "HS2 has never had a blank cheque from the Labour Party... We have to look for value for money and we have to look at how it benefits the country."

Bob Crow, general secretary of transport union RMT, said the "political posturing" over HS2 was a "smokescreen" designed to delay investment in the railways.

Graphic showing how HS2 will reduce journey times: London-Birmingham 35 minute saving; London-Nottingham 35 minute saving; London-Sheffield 46 minute saving; London-Leeds 50 minute saving; London-Manchester 60 minute saving.
 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 267.

    £42 Billion? I thought we had to tighten our belts and have a whole host of cut backs. We don't need to go from London to Birmingham 30 minutes faster... if you do just fly. It is actually cheaper and faster!

    What we need is cheaper rail, oh and a government that actually listens to it citizens.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 209.

    We cannot afford £14B to build a power station so rely China and France to fund it. We can afford £42B to build HS2 that will not work without electricty. The country needs electricty but we can live without HS2, electricty will benefit many HS2 a very small minority. If we have £42B to spare can we build without relying on other nations 3 new power stations. Please explain this is just crazy

  • rate this
    -7

    Comment number 131.

    If we scrap HS2, we will still need to consider an alternative project of a similar scale for our transport infrastructure. You can only neglect a system for so long before you need to expand it.

    In which case, just get on with HS2 now as scrapping it will yet again hold back our rail network for another couple of decades, whilst we do this process all over again.

  • rate this
    +27

    Comment number 86.

    How can saving half an hour on travel time be worth £42.6bn ?

  • rate this
    -8

    Comment number 59.

    People are so so shortsighted in this country. That's why our railway network is already 30 years behind the likes of Germany. We badly need this line to provide the additional capacity needed in 2030 and beyond. It's not just about the here and now people. In 10-15 years time it will be too late!!

 

Comments 5 of 7

 

More UK Politics stories

RSS

Features

  • Nigel Farage (left) and Douglas CarswellWho's next?

    The Tory MPs being tipped to follow Carswell to UKIP


  • A painting of the White House on fire by Tom FreemanFinders keepers

    The odd objects looted by the British from Washington in 1814


  • Sailing rock in Death ValleyRock and roll

    Mystery of Death Valley's 'sliding rocks' solved - and more tales


  • Chris and Regina Catrambone with their daughter Maria LuisaSOS

    The millionaires who rescue people at sea


Elsewhere on the BBC

Programmes

  • Dog wearing GoPro camera harnessClick Watch

    A camera harness for dogs, calls for more social media safeguards plus other tech news

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.