Asking the experts: What are economists saying about indyref figures?

Are people in Scotland better off in the United Kingdom, or as an independent country?

Be informed

Scotland Decides

Go to the BBC's Scotland Decides page for analysis, background and explainers on the independence debate.

On Wednesday, both the UK and Scottish governments put forward their cases for why they believe they provide the best economic path for Scotland.

Here, we take five claims from each side and ask a panel of economic experts to weigh up whether or not they stand up to scrutiny.

Experts, Prof John McLaren, Prof David Bell, and Dr Roger Cook give their thoughts.

line break
The case for the Scottish government

1. Scotland's finances in 2016-17 will be similar to, or stronger than, both the UK and the G7 industrialised countries as a whole.

Prof John McLaren (Economist, University of Glasgow): "Scotland's relative position will depend on, difficult to predict, future oil revenues and debt interest payments. The latter will be affected by future negotiations over the sharing out of UK debt.

Prof David Bell (Economist, University of Stirling): "The key issues would be how much of the UK debt Scotland agrees to shoulder, and whether North Sea oil revenues are as buoyant as the Scottish government hopes."

Dr Roger Cook (Head of Research, Scotland Institute): "This is realistic on several grounds. First, the current proposal is for independence to occur in April-May 2016. On this basis, in 2016-17 it will be unlikely that the main underlying figures (tax revenues, public expenditure) will have varied substantively. Since Scotland is a net contributor to the UK, then simply retaining more revenue will ensure a short term improvement over what would have happened if Scotland votes to stay in the UK."

2. Scotland's public finances show debt on a downward trajectory, enabling future Scottish governments to start an oil savings fund.

Prof John McLaren: "Such a trajectory depends on positive shifts in long term economic trends coming about. Even with these trends, the choice to start an oil savings fund would be at the cost of higher debt. Whether this would produce a net benefit depends on the rates of interest paid and received, attached to each."

Prof David Bell: "This would require Scotland to implement a substantial rebalancing of the public finances (i.e. an austerity programme) in order to create enough fiscal room to start building up the oil fund."

Dr Roger Cook: "In part this is related, as an immediate effect is the retention of additional revenues, even despite the likelihood of one-off costs around independence. The extent that this really means that debt is on a downward trajectory over the longer term is less clear. That depends on the gains (ie, not funding Trident, and lower defence spend in general), costs (ie, a move to a more generous social welfare system); economic performance and the contribution of North Sea Oil)."

3. Scotland's fiscal position between 2008-09 and 2012-13 is estimated to have been worth £8.3bn, equivalent to £1,600 per person.

Prof John McLaren: "This is in line with the figures published in the latest GERS publication."

Prof David Bell: "Scotland's fiscal deficit was smaller than that of the UK as a whole over this period. It was still large in relation to its historical level and in comparison with other countries, but it wasn't as large as that of the UK as a whole."

Dr Roger Cook: "As with all these estimates, this depends on the allocation of revenues and costs to Scotland. However, the methodology is well used and generally accepted, so on that basis, the sum claimed is realistic."

4. An independent Scotland could see tax income increase by £2,4bn a year by 2029-30, under a predicted 0.3% productivity increase.

Prof John McLaren: "A benefit of this order of size might arise. However, the difficulty is in achieving such an improvement in productivity, which is the holy grail for all economies."

Prof David Bell: "It would increase even more if there was a 0.5% productivity increase. The key question is what are the new mechanisms and policies that we can be confident will bring about these changes."

Dr Roger Cook: "The Office National Statistics has been reporting for some time that UK productivity has dropped substantially since 2008 and the UK as a whole lags badly by EU and OECD comparisons. Thus there is scope (and a need) to improve productivity and if it increased by 0.3% then the potential revenue gain is realistic. This question is really one of public policy. Does the SNP approach offer the means to avoid the problems that have plagued the UK in recent years?"

5. A 3.3% increase in Scotland's employment rate would move it up to the level of the top five performing countries in the OECD and could increase revenues by £1.3bn a year, by 2029-30.

Prof John McLaren: "A benefit of this order of size might arise. However, the difficulty arises in putting in place policies that will result in such an improvement in Scotland's employment rate."

Prof David Bell: "Again this is true. But we need to have some evidence as to what policies could be put in place that are not already available to the Scottish government that might help bring it about."

Dr Roger Cook: "The figures are perfectly true. In my estimate, the SNP has a more realistic policy around improving employment than it does in terms of productivity, mainly as it plans to address the ageing population issue through encouraging migration. It is also worth noting that the restructuring of the Scottish public sector by creating a full range of departments and agencies in Scotland will also create more jobs. Other realistic areas of net job creation lie in the renewable energy industry (and exporting the skills could be a valuable source of export earnings)."

Scottish tax receipts
line break
The case for the UK government
Money pile

1. Scotland, as part of the UK, was projected to be able to have lower tax or higher spending than under independence. This "UK Dividend" is estimated to be worth £1,400 per person in Scotland in each year from 2016-17 onwards.

Prof John McLaren: "This figure is based on a number of assumptions which could be questioned, including over future oil revenues and debt interest payments, any future borrowing premium, demographic trends, start up costs, etc. It is a possible figure but only one in a wide range of potential results."

Prof David Bell: "Again, this depends on the assumptions made about oil revenues. In the longer term, there is certainly an issue around somewhat greater costs of ageing in an independent Scotland. This could in theory be offset by very high net migration into Scotland. But firstly, the only recent experience of substantial net migration into Scotland was when the A8 countries joined the EU in the early part of this century and secondly, would the rest of the UK be willing to share open borders with Scotland if there were large numbers of immigrants coming into Scotland that could potentially move to the rest of the UK (rUK)?"

Dr Roger Cook: "There are two major problems in this claim. First it relies on the claims of setting up the governance of an independent Scotland that has already been debunked - not least by the experts the Treasury claims to have used. Second the table on page 10 is based on a series of assumptions. In effect, yes the number is valid if you believe the logic behind it. But even in its own terms, it assumes that an independent Scotland will carry on paying for things (such as Trident's renewal) that the SNP has indicated will not be the case. The analysis also depends heavily on the allocation of debt."

2. Under independence, the loss of the UK Dividend would mean £1,400 per year for each Scottish person in higher taxes and lower public spending.

Prof John McLaren: "This depends on the £1,400 figure being accurate and there are many questionable assumptions attached to it."

Prof. David Bell: "This follows, based on the assumptions about oil. See my blog for further details."

Dr Roger Cook: "There is no real evidence for this. At the moment, Scotland is a net contributor within the UK, so the most likely short term position will be fiscally neutral and the longer term is as much a matter of the consequences of public policy rather than based on simple financial models."

3. The "direct costs" of independence would include higher interest rates for an independent Scottish state to borrow, the net costs of setting up new institutions, and the net costs of funding the Scottish government's White Paper policies (including the potential economic benefits).

Prof John McLaren: "All of these higher costs could potentially arise. However, their scale is very uncertain and depends on decisions made by an independent Scottish government. Equally the UK would also be subject to some extra start up costs after the allocation of various UK assets."

Prof David Bell: "Small states tend to have to pay a "liquidity premium" on their interest rates. This arises simply because their markets are small and therefore it's more difficult to match buyers and sellers. Clearly, many of the policies listed, or hinted at, in the White paper would involve additional costs. The funds for these would have to come from higher taxes levied on Scottish taxpayers."

Dr Roger Cook: "One major criticism of the SNP's White Paper is that it rarely addresses set up costs. The figures used in the Treasury paper have been discredited, but that is not to deny they will exist and maybe substantial. The Scotland Institute has done some work (due to be published soon) on the approach to regulation of public utilities and estimated that the unitary regulator that is being proposed would cost £80m-£110m (depends mostly on whether a new office would be built or leased). A lot of this is the cost of a merger with considerable voluntary severance. Of course, the other side of the coin will be the creation of 180 or so jobs in Scotland."

4. If the UK debt was split according to population at the end of 2015-16, an independent Scotland would take on debt of about 74% of its GDP, which could reach "unsustainable levels without policy action".

Prof John McLaren: "The very fact that it would reach 'unsustainable levels without policy action' suggests that there would indeed be such policy action. The Scottish government have put forward proposals with respect to productivity, the employment rate and migration that they see would give a very different outcome."

Prof David Bell: "Some countries quite happily exist with much higher levels of debt - Japan, for example. The difficulty for Scotland would be that, unlike these countries, it has no 'credit history' so it will be difficult for the market to price its debt. If the market takes a very negative view about Scotland's capability to repay its debts, it might be charged punitive interest rates. It would then have no option but to adopt very tough policies aimed at reducing the debt."

Dr Roger Cook: "The basic assumption in the UK paper is that debt would be allocated on the basis of population but there are alternatives such as per GDP or on a historical basis. All of these give different starting positions. Fundamentally, there is no agreement between the Scottish government analysis which shows Scotland with a lower debt/GDP ratio and the UK government's claims.

"The variance is partly due to the Treasury analysis not taking account that Scotland is currently a net contributor to the UK and partly their assessment of the costs of the proposals in the White Paper, and an assumption that an independent Scotland could not manage to solve the issues of an ageing population, productivity and employment rates. These are essentially political judgements dressed up as dispassionate numerical analysis (on both sides of the argument)."

5. Scotland's fiscal position already relies on spending all of the revenues from a geographic share of the North Sea. So there would be no fiscal benefit from independence.

Prof John McLaren: "Most of the analysis put forward by the Scottish government includes North Sea revenues within the annual fiscal balance figures. Its removal would worsen the balance. The potential to use such revenues elsewhere e.g in an Oil Fund, would be a policy decision. The key variables which currently determine whether Scotland would see a fiscal benefit or loss from independence remain future North sea revenues and future debt interest payments."

Prof David Bell: "Oil revenues are likely to decline in the future. But if Scotland can find policies that increase the productivity of the average Scot (better skills, new products etc) the Scottish economy could grow more rapidly and generate more taxes. This would make its spending plans more affordable."

Dr Roger Cook: "This is of no particular importance. Scotland is currently a net contributor to the UK (so will gain in the short term on independence) and it doesn't really matter in the first instance if this is driven by oil revenues or other economic activity.

"Again, this is a political argument. Successive UK governments have found it expedient to treat oil revenue as a means to fund current expenditure (or cut taxes) so the assumption is that an independent Scottish government will do so too. However, there will be real set up costs and these could well absorb the immediate gain of no longer contributing to the rUK, and in turn that could make it harder for the Scottish government to make an early start on creating a long term oil fund."

Treasury graph

More on This Story

More Scotland politics stories


Scotland Live

    07:40: Union flag on public works

    Plaques featuring the union flag and the line "funded by the UK government" are to be displayed on publicly-funded projects.

    It is part of plans being announced by the Treasury Secretary Danny Alexander, who said the aim was to recognise UK taxpayers' contributions.


    The SNP has branded the plan a "silly gimmick" that won't disguise cuts to public services.

    Projects funded by the European Union already display the EU flag.

    07:37: Coming up... BBC Radio Scotland

    On Good Morning Scotland this morning:

    • "Tidal lagoon" power

    • 300 years of weather

    • East Coast main line

    @BBCDouglasF Rangers latest Douglas Fraser Business and economy editor, Scotland

    Now ex-chairman of #Rangers, David Somers looks back: at least #rfc paid its bills + didn't go under on his watch.

    07:24: East Coast back in private hands

    After six years of public ownership, East Coast Mainline rail services have been re-privatised.

    East coast

    Virgin, which already operates West Coast rail services, has taken over the East Coast franchise, in partnership with Stagecoach.

    The line links London with Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Inverness.

    The companies are promising to improve the service for passengers, following two failed private franchise ventures.

    07:19: Rangers 'avoided going under during my tenure' - Somers

    David Somers, who has resigned as Rangers chairman, says he tried to bring "harmony" to the club.

    "When I was approached about the chairmanship of Rangers, friends warned me that the world of football has different rules and codes of behaviour," he said.

    Former Rangers chairman David Somers

    "I now know that is a gross understatement. I am a non-confrontational man and have always tried to bring harmony to boardrooms and with stakeholders.

    "At the risk of antagonising my army of critics I would point out that Rangers managed to pay its bills and avoid going under during my tenure.

    "These critics might not agree with how we achieved this. I look forward to alternative solutions from whoever is running the club in the future.

    "Despite the personal attacks on me from various sources I genuinely wish the club the very best in the future and I am confident that, with such a passionate and vociferous fanbase, they will be restored to their former glories."

    07:15: 'Families to lose out'

    Single parents with young children could lose more than £1,800 a year under the UK government's welfare reforms, according to research.

    Couples with young children will be only £400 better off than single parents, the Scottish Parliament's Welfare Reform Committee said.


    Research conducted by Sheffield Hallam University claimed families with children will lose an estimated £960m a year under the reforms.

    The Department of Work and Pensions said the report did not take into account increases in employment and the personal allowance and the introduction of the new Universal Credit.

    07:10: Breaking News

    Rangers confirm David Somers has resigned as chairman with immediate effect. The move is confirmed in a statement to the Stock Exchange.

    07:09: Capital growth

    Scotland's hotel sector will continue to grow over the next year with Edinburgh expected to be among the most popular cities in Europe, a report says.

    Along with London and Paris, Scotland's capital is one of only three cities in Europe forecast to have occupancy rates more than 80% in the next year.

    Edinburgh Castle

    A series of events elsewhere in the country over the next 12 months, including the World Gymnastics Championship, the Turner Prize and the Year of Food and Drink, will boost the sector in Glasgow and elsewhere, PwC's latest European hotel forecast says.

    07:06: Murder inquiry into Hamilton death

    Detectives have launched a murder inquiry into the death of a man in South Lanarkshire.

    Stephen Coutts, 35, died following an incident in Mayfield Road, Hamilton, on Saturday evening.

    Stephen Coutts died and another man was taken to hospital

    Another man, also 35, was injured and is in a stable condition in hospital.

    Det Insp David Moran, of Police Scotland, appealed for anyone with information to come forward.

    "Officers are conducting inquiries in the surrounding area to establish what happened," he said.

    @BBCScotWeather 'Risk of ice BBC Scotland Weather Latest

    Morning, Gillian here. There's a risk of ice and frequent snow showers today, especially in western Scotland. Accumulations, mainly over high ground. Becoming windy. 4C.

    07:02: Somers to leave Ibrox? Chris McLaughlin BBC Sport

    Rangers chairman David Somers is to step down just days before his future in the position is due to be voted on by shareholders.

    Rangers chairman David Somers

    An extraordinary general meeting is being held at Ibrox on Friday, 6 March, at which the future of the current board will be decided.

    It is unclear if chief executive Derek Llambias and finance director Barry Leach will also go before Friday.

    An announcement is expected this morning regarding Somers' position.

    07:00: Welcome Marianne Taylor BBC Scotland news

    Good morning and welcome to BBC Scotland Live, bringing you all the latest news, sport, weather and travel from across the country until 19:00.

    Stay in touch via Twitter @bbcscotlandnews, by email on or by text on 80295.



  • hair dot combA cut above

    What is Scotland's punniest shop name?

  • A very clever little girlBrain gain

    Why are people getting better at intelligence tests?

  • BeefaloBeefalo hunt

    The hybrid animal causing havoc in the Grand Canyon

  • A British Rail signBringing back BR

    Would it be realistic to renationalise the railways?

  • Banksy image of girl letting go of heart-shaped balloonFrom the heart

    Fergal Keane on the relationship between love and politics

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.