Five weeks on, Welsh MPs debate the Queen's speech

 

We may live in a world of rolling news and 24/7 media but some events are slow-burners.

It's now five weeks since the Queen opened parliament and unveiled the government's plans for new laws for the new parliamentary year.

Today, MPs on the Welsh grand committee (catch it while you can here) are holding a four-hour debate on the contents of the Queen's speech and their likely impact on Wales.

Welsh Secretary David Jones opened the debate this morning, focusing initially on a bill that wasn't in the speech - one to hold a referendum on Britain's membership of the EU.

He talked about the economy, telling the committee: "It is not governments who create jobs; it is business people". (Remember that next time the government claims the credit for jobs created).

Mr Jones's wider defence of government energy policy was dismissed very audibly as "absolute cobblers" by Labour's Huw Irranca-Davies but the language was not ruled unparlaimentary.

The Queen's speech mentioned one draft bill that would affect Wales alone - one that lifts the ban on assembly candidates standing in both a constituency and on a regional list. The draft Wales bill would move the assembly from four to five year fixed terms and ban "double-jobbing" in Wales and Westminster.

That bill, when it arrives, will also include any changes that result from the UK government's response to the Silk commission's suggest that the assembly be given responsibility for raising some of the money it spends.

We have been promised that response by "the end of spring". David Jones said the summer solstice takes place at 0645 on June 21 (nine days away), but he couldn't guarantee that his government would deliver the response by then.

Liberal Democrat Mark Williams tried to push Mr Jones for a date but the nearest he got to one was a promise it would be revealed "in very early course".

Mr Jones's Labour shadow, Owen Smith announced that a future Labour government would re-introduce the ban on dual candidacy.

Plaid Cymru's Hywel Williams tried a new approach. "The traditional response from Plaid Cymru to successive Queen's speeches has been 'not a lot in it for Wales'," he said. "Commentators such as the venerable Mr Cornock at the BBC have delighted in pointing out to us our predictability."

Mr Williams said he wanted to confound the commentators by asking more positively what was in the speech for Wales. "The answer thunders back to me immediately - not a lot."

 
David Cornock, Parliamentary correspondent, Wales Article written by David Cornock David Cornock Parliamentary correspondent, Wales

Tax 'slap in the face for Wales'

Plaid Cymru have used a debate on the Finance Bill to highlight differences between Labour in Wales and at the party Westminster.

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 10.

    "UKIP want an English Parliamnet with English MPs. Sounds like devolution to me. "
    To me, as well. However, I don't support the Home Counties redknecks of UKIP, a bunch of latter day Poujadists, retired builders with a villa in Spain, local councillors with their seat at the golf club.
    I may be on the wrong side of history. This may be another step in the breakup of the 1913 British Empire.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    Recent events have damaged the Unionist cause, not least the virulent hostility to all things English

    UKIP want an English Parliamnet with English MPs. Sounds like devolution to me. So, you may get independence - and good luck!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 8.

    #7 You aren't reading clearly. You may well want devolution,or even "DevoMax" What I am repeatedly pointing out is that devolution isn't down to Wales: it is a matter of agreement. And, if you can't agree, then you part. Recent events have damaged the Unionist cause, not least the virulent hostility to all things English. So, you may get independence - and good luck!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 7.

    6.Boxer_the_Horse
    You've just justified Devolution. Thank You.
    You may be right because UKIP want and English Parliament with English MPs. So they will say good and goodbye

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 6.

    "The SE and London see the rest of the UK as parasitic connections to their taxes!"
    Perhaps you might consider that - if that were true - you might find that their idea for DevoMax exceeds yours. Mab wants "give us the money and don't interfere".
    They may want "You want Independence: Good, and Goodbye. "

 

Comments 5 of 10

 

Features & Analysis

  • Woman in swimming pool Green stuff

    The element that makes a familiar smell when mixed with urine


  • Plane at Shannon airportShannon's call

    The airport that hosted a roll-call of presidents


  • Susanne du ToitTop 10 Tips

    Portrait painter Susanne du Toit on being an artist


  • Atletico's Diego Godin celebrates his goal with teammate David VillaWeek in pictures

    The best news photographs from around the world


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • ITChild's play

    It's never been easier for small businesses to get their message out to the world

Programmes

  • Joe Ierardi playing a pianoClick Watch

    Meet the man trying to create the perfect digital piano - but is it as good as the real thing?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.