Unesco warns Australia over Great Barrier Reef

Fish at the Great Barrier Reef The Great Barrier Reef is the world's largest coral structure and home to rich marine life

Related Stories

Unesco has threatened to list the Great Barrier Reef as a World Heritage in Danger site, amid controversy over a plan to dump dredged sediment.

Reef authorities granted permission for the dumping in January as part of a project to create one of the world's biggest coal ports.

But scientists have warned that the sediment could smother or poison coral.

Unesco said given "significant threats" to the reef, it should be considered for inclusion on the danger list.

The Great Barrier Reef is the world's largest coral structure, rich in marine life. It stretches for more than 2,600km (1,680 miles) along Australia's eastern coast.

'Other alternatives'

The dumping is part of a major development that would allow several companies to export coal reserves from the Galilee Basin area through the Abbot Point port.

Abbot Point lies south of Townsville on the Queensland coast.

Late last year, the government approved an application for the coal terminal to be expanded. The dredging is needed to allow ships into the port.

Map showing the location of the sediment disposal site

The approved disposal site for the dredged sediment is located approximately 25km (16 miles) east-north-east of the port, inside the marine park.

The disposal operation would be "subject to strict environmental conditions", the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority said when it approved the plan.

But the plan remains highly controversial.

In its report, Unesco said that the Abbot Point dumping plan was "noted with concern".

"Indeed, this was approved, despite an indication that less impacting disposal alternatives may exist," the report pointed out.

More widely, it said that a long-term plan for sustainable development due to be completed by Australia by 2015 had to result in "concrete and consistent management measures sufficiently robust to ensure the overall conservation" of the reef.

In particular, it had to address major drivers of reef decline "such as water quality and climate change, and the need to constrain coastal development and associated activities".

"Given the range of significant threats affecting the property and the conflicting information about the effectiveness of recent decisions and draft policies, significant concern remains regarding the long-term deterioration of key aspects of... [the reef] and the completion of work to tackle short- and long-term threats," it said.

In the absence of "substantial progress", Unesco should consider putting the reef on the endangered list at a summit to be held in 2015, the report said.

Australia's Environment Minister Greg Hunt pointed out that the report highlighted progress in a number of areas, including water quality.

The approval of the Abbot Point development "was subject to rigorous environmental assessment", he said in a statement.

Queensland's Environment Minister Andrew Powell, meanwhile, said he was confident that ongoing work would mean the reef was not listed as endangered.

"We are committed to protecting the reef, we can continue to operate sensible, environmentally responsible ports adjacent to the reef," the Australian Broadcasting Corporation quoted him as saying.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 121.

    Australia is one of the most green, ecology/environmentally aware countries out there.

    Impact of mining and mineral extraction is heavily regulated and monitored, I cant see them allowing their Great Barrier reef to be obliterated by tipping.

  • rate this

    Comment number 118.

    A lot of the time environmentalists cry wolf but this time they have a point.

    The reef is Australia's number one natural asset and surely there is a risk of an impaired local reef (damage to the coral itself / mutations in plant/animal life) spreading and infecting the whole system.

    Dumping out at sea would be good economics - avoiding potential damage and protecting tourist revenue

  • rate this

    Comment number 53.

    Dumping sediment upon a reef sounds like a recipe for disaster. It does not take a genius to work out the possible consequences. They should leave well alone.

  • rate this

    Comment number 48.

    It's my understanding that any coral reef is an extremely fragile ecosystem so they have got a point. There has to be better ways to do it. Force the dredging (and mining) companies to pay for it to be removed much farther out to sea. Sell it to a country that wants to create artificial land. Run a railway north, if this coal is going to China anyway. Just don't kill off a beautiful environment

  • rate this

    Comment number 19.

    Why on earth can't they dump their sediment way out to sea slowly and spread out, thereby avoiding the reef area and diluting it so much it smothers nothing? I can't see that it would cost that much more to sail further away.


Comments 5 of 7


More Asia stories


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • TravelAround the world

    BBC Travel takes a look at the most striking images from the past seven days


  • A bicycle with a Copenhagen WheelClick Watch

    The wheel giving push bikes an extra boost by turning them into smart electric hybrids

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.