EU budget talks for 2013 collapse

 
European Parliament President Martin Schulz - file pic British Conservative MEPs clashed with Martin Schulz over a 9bn euro request for 2012

Related Stories

Talks to agree the EU's 2013 budget have collapsed, after negotiators from the EU and member states were unable to agree on extra funding for 2012.

The EU Commission and European Parliament had asked for a budget rise of 6.8% in 2013.

But most governments wanted to limit the rise to just 2.8%.

The failure of the talks will dent hopes of agreement on the 2014-2020 budget, which is up for discussion later this month, correspondents say.

Friday's dispute was over an extra 9bn euros (£7bn; $12bn) in "emergency funding" for 2012, to cover budgets for education, infrastructure and research projects.

But Germany, France and other governments questioned the funding, and eight hours of talks produced no agreement.

"Under these conditions, we felt that negotiations which hadn't really begun by six o'clock in the evening couldn't reasonably be expected to finish during the night," said the parliament's lead negotiator, Alain Lamassoure.

At the European parliament, UK Conservative MEPs clashed with Parliament President Martin Schulz, a German Social Democrat, over the extra 9bn euros shortfall for 2012.

In 2012 the budget was 129.1bn euros, a 1.9% increase on 2011.

'Life-changing experience'

Among the schemes facing a shortfall this year is the Erasmus student exchange programme.

It has allowed nearly three million young Europeans to study abroad since it was launched 25 years ago.

In an open letter to EU leaders on Friday more than 100 famous Europeans, including film directors and footballers, warned that "thousands could miss out on a potentially life-changing experience".

Friday's talks did produce a declaration of political will to provide 670m euros to earthquake victims in Italy, but no agreement on how to finance it, the European Parliament said.

It said that if no agreement on the 2013 budget could be reached in the next 21 days, the European Commission would look to revise its budget proposal.

The UK's Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Greg Clark, said the EU needed to practise "fiscal discipline".

"The UK and a number of other countries were very clear from the outset that the Commission and the European Parliament should not be asking taxpayers for billions of extra euros when the spending in member states is being reduced," he said.

The UK government, led by the Conservatives, has also objected to a proposed increase in the multi-year budget for 2014-2020, threatening a veto if necessary.

An EU summit aimed at reaching a deal on that budget will be held on 22-23 November.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +16

    Comment number 605.

    Seems that the countries who are paying want to reduce, or at least freeze, the budget. And not surprisingly those who are receiving want it to increase. The EU is damned (and possibly doomed) by allowing new members to join who could only take, not give.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 603.

    In these times of austerity, when many are facing static or reduced wages, where Govmnt depts and public bodies are cutting staff, where people cannot keep up with rising food and fuel prices, when we are "all in it together", why does the EU Commission think they have a right to an increase in funding.

    I would urge everyone reading here to write to their MEP to ask this very pertinent question.

  • rate this
    +65

    Comment number 400.

    Amazing. Some EU member states are facing the reality of 25% unemployment, indebtedness beyond rational comprehension and this joke of an EU Commission/European Parliament are expecting billions in extra funding. Can they please explain where this money is going to come from? Perhaps they are collectively willing to take a pay cut to aid their goal?

  • rate this
    +80

    Comment number 352.

    I propose EU funding is reduced by 5% every year until they produce audited accounts. Once those have been produced we consider whether an increase is justified based on what these accounts tell us. NO negations on funding take place until that happens. Simple.

  • rate this
    +68

    Comment number 190.

    I attended Leiden University in Holland through Erasmus. The EU gave me a grant of £400 to cover travel and the difference in living costs compared to UK. My rent was a 3rd of what I paid in Oxford, living costs were much lower, and my return flight cost £80. At the end of my exchange the EU wrote to me saying there was 'money left over in the pot' and gave me a further £150! What a waste

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

More Europe stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • GeoguessrWhere in the world?

    Think you’re a geography expert? Test your knowledge with BBC Travel’s Geoguessr

Programmes

  • Suspension bridge connecting mountain peaksThe Travel Show Watch

    Must-see global events including walking the first suspension bridge to connect mountain peaks

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.