Talks on long-term Iran nuclear deal open in Vienna

 

Iran nuclear talks explained - in 60 seconds

Iran has begun formal talks with six world powers in Vienna to try to reach a comprehensive agreement to limit its controversial nuclear programme.

The three-day meeting seeks to build on an interim deal signed in November that saw Iran curb uranium enrichment in return for partial sanctions relief.

Both Iran and the US have downplayed hopes of a quick breakthrough.

The world powers suspect Iran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons, something it vigorously denies.

It insists that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.

'Not optimistic'

Analysis

Having got to this point at all is progress. But there is little optimism on either side that the talks will succeed.

Mutual suspicion remains great and there is still a fundamental uncertainty as to what Iran really wants.

Is it prepared to reduce its nuclear programme to a minimum to lift sanctions, get its economy back on track and become a more "normal" player in world affairs?

Or is it seeking to achieve a loosening of sanctions while retaining the status of a threshold nuclear state, ie one that has the capability to move towards developing a nuclear bomb reasonably quickly at a time of its own choosing?

Several key problems must be resolved if there is to be a long-term deal.

The talks between representatives of Iran and the so-called P5+1 - the US, UK, France, China and Russia plus Germany - are being chaired by the EU's foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton.

After dinner with Baroness Ashton on Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said he believed a long-term agreement was possible.

"If all sides enter the talks with the political will, we will be able to reach positive results. But it will take time," he was quoted as saying by the state news agency, Irna.

Mr Zarif's remarks came after Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has final say in nuclear matters, was pessimistic about the prospects of a long-term deal.

"What our foreign ministry and officials have started will continue and Iran will not violate its commitments... but this will not lead anywhere," he said in a speech in Tehran.

He added: "I am not optimistic about the negotiations. It will not lead anywhere, but I am not opposed either."

A senior US government official also played down expectations, saying it would be a "complicated, difficult and lengthy process".

"It is probably as likely that we won't get an agreement as it is that we will," the official told reporters in Vienna. "But these negotiations are the best chance we have ever had."

IAEA inspectors verify that connections between centrifuges have been disconnected at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility (20 January 2014) Last month, Iranian scientists halted all enrichment of uranium to 20%

It took months of very hard bargaining for the two sides to agree to try to negotiate a final deal, and Tuesday's talks will be the first test of that resolve, the BBC's Bethany Bell in Vienna reports.

'Red lines'

The West wants Iran to scale back permanently its sensitive nuclear activities to ensure that it cannot assemble a nuclear weapon. But Iran says its nuclear work will continue and wants an end to the sanctions that have battered its economy.

Iran nuclear deal

  • 20 January - First day of implementation of interim nuclear deal. IAEA begins verifying Iranian compliance; P5+1 and EU suspend sanctions
  • 18 February - Iran and P5+1 begin talks in Vienna to find a "comprehensive solution"
  • 19 April - Completion of dilution of Iran's 20% enriched uranium stockpile in hexafluoride form
  • 19 July - Expiry of six-month interim period for finding comprehensive solution. If not renewed by mutual consent, P5+1 may increase sanctions
  • November - Iran and P5+1 aim to "conclude negotiating and commence implementing" the second step of any comprehensive solution

The interim deal, which was struck in November but only took effect on 20 January, gives Iran and the P5+1 six months to negotiate a "comprehensive solution", although it can be extended.

It obliges Iran to: halt production of near-20% enriched uranium, which could be further enriched to weapons-grade relatively quickly; dilute half of its stockpile; commit not to commission or fuel the Arak heavy-water reactor, from where spent fuel plutonium could be extracted; and submit to daily inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

In return, the P5+1 has eased sanctions on trade in petrochemicals, precious metals and on the provision of insurance for oil shipments. It has also committed to give Iran access to $4.2bn of oil revenue frozen in foreign banks at monthly intervals.

The issues for the permanent deal are said to include the level of Iran's ongoing enrichment of uranium; the underground enrichment facility at Fordo; the Arak reactor; and Tehran's willingness to let inspectors visit the Parchin military complex, where the IAEA suspects activities "relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device" were carried out.

Iran has a number of "red lines", including not dismantling any facilities.

Key nuclear sites map
 

More on This Story

Rouhani's Iran

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

-->

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 84.

    Iran is as rational as any other developed country, this is a stepping stone to progress.

    Keep them talking, include them on internation problems and help them fix 35 years of isolation caused by americal foreign and domestic interests.

    You dont see many countries with stealth drones, Iran is one of them, its a small club just like nuclear weapons.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 64.

    I have no problem with Iran developing nuclear weapons. They are no less scary or toxic than the states that already have them.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 39.

    Communication can only be a good thing. Instantly writing off Iran as incapable of reasonable debate based on propaganda and misleading information will leave us nowhere. It makes me worry when I see all the hate filled remarks on here that will have no positive effect and only serve to keep tensions high. Any questionable practices they may have will not be addressed without talk based on respect

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 17.

    The sooner Iran allows inspectors into its nuclear programs, the better, and President Rouhani is certainly making concrete efforts in this direction. We should all work for a nuclear weapon free world.

    Iran has suffered despotism ever since the UK and USA overthrew their democratic government in 1953. Iran has suffered the tyranny of madmen ever since, compounded by our trade sanctions.

 
 

More Middle East stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • ConcordeTime for change

    BBC Future looks at the crashes that altered plane designs forever

Programmes

  • French fashion designer Jean Paul Gaultier HARDtalk Watch

    French fashion designer Jean Paul Gaultier on why he uses unconventional models in shows

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.