Bradley Manning: Hero or villain?

 
Supporters of Bradley Manning 24 November 2011 Bradley Manning has been in custody since May 2010 when he was arrested in Iraq

Private Bradley Manning is of course innocent until proven guilty, although his commander-in-chief doesn't seem to have much doubt that he's broken the law.

Pte Manning is the intelligence analyst who US authorities suspect of being behind the hugely embarrassing Wikileaks releases. He was arrested in Iraq last May for illegally downloading material from America's secret internet network.

His appearance in the court room in Fort Meade, Maryland, is under what is known as an article 32 hearing in the military code. It is more than a formality. It will decide whether he will face a court martial and is likely to feature an outline of the arguments on both sides, cross-examination of witnesses and could last up to a week.

If he is found guilty of the charge of supplying information to the enemy he could be executed, although the prosecution have made it clear they will not seek the death penalty. He could however be jailed for life.

This case probably will not be about the facts. It will be about the rights and wrongs of what he did.

Disturbed young man

To some he is a hero, to others a villain.

Many in America will feel, if he is guilty, it is quite clear that he is a traitor who has broken his vows to his country and deserves harsh punishment. Some have even said what he and Wikileaks have done amounts to terrorism.

The defence may choose to paint a picture of a disturbed young man, sensitive and gay adrift in a macho culture. They are likely to bring up allegations that he has been subjected to deliberately punitive detention in a military brig.

There is a suggestion that they will focus on arguing the release of the material didn't do much harm.

But it will be interesting if they put the main point of his many supporters - that what Manning did transcends legal rules and national interests, that information wants to be free, and that truth is more important than government's desire to keep something secret.

Behind this is a specific allegation - that orders to Manning were illegal.

To that end, the defence wants to call US President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the stand.

I doubt we will be seeing them at Fort Meade, but it should make for some interesting exchanges.

I will, I hope, be blogging and tweeting from the courtroom, if allowed.

 
Mark Mardell Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell Presenter, The World This Weekend

An ending - and a beginning

Mark Mardell says farewell to his years as North America editor, and introduces his new analysis blog.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 259.

    We feel betrayed by Mr Manning. portraying him as an honorable whistleblower is naive .The case of Assange is different because he had no obligation to us.
    Though, assange machine can be prosecuted as an enemy collaborator if we can find such a link.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 258.

    John Harnes @255

    Maybe you KNOW more than others

    Perhaps what you GUESS is right

    And what you can guess so SHOULD Bradley Manning have guessed

    That said, do YOU know enough of COUNTER-arguments?

    Was this decision 'agonised' or 'despairing' or 'petulant' or 'out of mind'

    I don't know. Certainly Big Issues. Evaluation underway. Fair we hope.

    Look up Steve Jobs & insulin

    Body over Mind?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 257.

    Manning nothing less than a Hero. He stood for what is right.

    Bush, Chaney, Rummy, Condy etc. are nothing less than criminals. The laws help to protect criminals. If Saddam qualifies for punishments for his deeds why not these criminals? Is that simply because of they are something special?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 256.

    It is absolute shame that national secrecy laws are used to hide state sponsored crimes and the criminals. If the laws to become transparent there will be interpol alert on Bush, Chaney, Rumsfield. They are nothing less than Hitler.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 255.

    This man stole secrets while in the uniform of his country. He is not a hero. He deserves the full punishment under military law. In other countries he would of been shot and just disappeared.

    Those who think of him as a hero should wonder how many people died by the release of this information. The US has an all volunteer military. No one forced him join. He betrayed his oath and nation.

 

Comments 5 of 259

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • FutureThe future is now

    Get the latest updates and biggest ideas from BBC Future’s World-Changing Ideas Summit

Programmes

  • A virtual girlfriendClick Watch

    Using the latest tech to find friends on a night out and meet a virtual girlfriend

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.