Obama's gay marriage moment

 

Obama: "Same sex couples should be able to get married"

It is the first big unexpected moment of the US presidential election campaign.

I was inclined to scoff when ABC called their special news report a "historic political and cultural moment", but on reflection the hype is right.

President Obama, who had looked a little lame suggesting that his position on gay marriage was evolving (and here is how it evolved) has now come out personally, firmly, in favour.

He said at one time he thought that civil partnership was enough.

But now: "I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married."

He said there was a generational change and cited his daughters as an example.

"There have been times where Michelle and I have been sitting around the dinner table and we're talking about their friends and their parents and Malia and Sasha, it wouldn't dawn on them that somehow their friends' parents would be treated differently," he said.

"It doesn't make sense to them and frankly, that's the kind of thing that prompts a change in perspective."

Smorgasbord of policies

There is a risk in this. For some it will further brand Mr Obama as the devil in disguise, destroying the fabric of America. That sharpens the election, but it does no harm to his campaign.

Most social conservatives will not vote for Mr Obama anyway. But there are natural supporters, like African-American evangelical Christians, who won't like this.

North Carolina, an important swing state, has just voted to outlaw gay marriage and partnerships.

But Obama explicitly mentioned his religious faith:

"When we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it's also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated."

While not doubting that the president has struggled long and hard with this, this seems to me a deliberate moment.

Maybe the timing was rushed, but I am sure the campaign had looked at this again and again. I suspect they calculated this will fire up liberals, and make them more likely to vote.

It is after all not only a very divisive issue, it is something for the future, something that can "evolve" still further in a second term.

The US is a smorgasbord of policies when it comes to gay partnership rights.

At a federal level, the one thing that could be done is to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. The law means that other states don't have to recognise rights granted by one state. There is no sign, and perhaps no likelihood that Mr Obama would back repeal.

But it is the logical next move and I would expect campaigners will want to know what his personal views mean in term of government policy. It's not just about the economy, after all.

 
Mark Mardell, North America editor Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell North America editor

More on This Story

US Presidential Election 2012

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 47.

    33. GatesheadDave
    One banner will be the "Stars and Bars" ever aligned with opposing human [especially minority] rights. On the upside, I expect brisk business at stores selling sheets and large non-flame retardant crosses.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 46.

    11. jack "the Good solid people of North Carolina" are/were also against: mixed marriage, equal rights for non-whites, equal rights for women, abolition of slavery.

    Solid heads, indeed, and a clear pattern that spreads across the "Bible belt." Their preference is Leviticus not Jesus.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 45.

    As they say, ignorance is bliss; therefore there are too many happy people posting here. If you truly believe in your God and his teachings, pay attention to all of them not just the ones that suit your agenda. Every generation makes progress on Civil Rights (abolition of slavery, vote for women, mixed-race marriages, etc.) it just takes time to weed out and marginalize the bigots.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 44.

    Regardless of my personal moral beliefs, I have to say that I don't see how you can legislate against gay marriage. That infringes upon someones rights and choices.

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 43.

    The world must grief at such statements from Obama. How do we intend to have future children if the same sexes are married. What is the plan for our children now? Encourage them for same sax marriages? The world is going blind. What is the thought of the low class animals such as cats, dogs, etc, will the go after the same sexes as we of the "advanced" class are doing. Shame on the world leaders

 

Comments 5 of 47

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • ClockMore for less?

    Could spending less time in the office make you perform more efficiently?

Programmes

  • A factory in JapanThe Travel Show Watch

    Factory infatuation – why Japan’s industrial compounds are drawing large crowds at night

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.