Obama victorious, but not yet the master politician

Barack Obama talks on the phone in his motorcade in July 2012

Barack Obama has been re-elected president of the United States, defeating his Republican rival Mitt Romney. But the last four years have been a rocky ride for him, and a test of his leadership qualities.

It was the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico where I first really questioned Obama's political skills.

Heading out in a speed-boat to see the oil spill, I felt exhilarated in the hot sun - the wind blowing spray in my face.

I felt as excited as a little boy as I waded ashore a tiny island looking for tell-tale signs of rusty-red liquid among the puddles and reeds.

I was pleased to find a restaurant owner, standing over a steaming vat of crawfish, explaining how the catastrophe threatened her business.

Start Quote

A politician needs to be able to go door-to-door with their wares”

End Quote

There it is. It's not pretty, but I love my job - and sometimes it means covering situations that are dreadful for other people.

Of course I wish they hadn't happened, but for me, they are an opportunity and - frankly - a thrill.

Some politicians feel the same. Those who get called "great", are the ones who seize whatever moment comes their way, make it their own, impose their will on it - indeed shape it - to make it better for their people.

In the Gulf, Obama seemed curiously detached from the people. A president making a speech from the Oval Office is a big moment, and I watched it from a house on the shore, with the concerned owner, who was in the tourism business.

A dead oil-covered fish lies on the beach in May 2010 on Grand Isle, Louisiana

It wasn't a bad speech - the president had said sensible things. But he hadn't wrought the phrases that make a nation lean forward on the sofa, or bring strong Americans to the point of tears. It was a bit ordinary.

Until then, I had resisted the conclusion that he wasn't all that he was cracked up to be. The criticism seemed premature, and missing the point - he was elected to be different.

So many of the attacks, then and now, are the puerile work of fantasists - that he was born in Kenya, is a communist revolutionary, or secretly a convert to Islam.

They are attacks on an icon for daring to exist, and they make it easier to be over-generous in overlooking the flaws of the real man.

He was accused of dithering before deciding what to do over Afghanistan. Much of the world might be relieved that he thought before acting.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Some expressed surprise that he tackled healthcare at the same time as the economic crisis - but if he was going to do something big, he had to start it in that first year.

But it was clumsy in execution. The deal-making was grubby, Obama didn't impose his will with that false bonhomie, back-slapping and elbow-grabbing that is the heart of the dark art of handling Congress.

It is curiously easy for someone with real power to awe these wily vain old men. Obama couldn't stoop. He barely conquered, and what emerged was an obscure compromise, hard to sell in a 10-second sound bite.

On the anniversary of his victory, I sat around the kitchen table in student digs to hear the complaints of young people who had celebrated that night in Grant Park.

They were worried that he was too keen to use the troops, hadn't moved ahead on gay rights, or immigration. Fair enough. A leader of the left will often disappoint the left.

A woman holding an Obama sign saying "hope"

During the mid-term elections, I travelled across the country, clutching that famous poster of hope, asking people if they still had any. Despite the state of the economy, many did.

But it did not stop Obama getting what he called a "shellacking". Rarely have I seen a politicians so exposed, so bewildered, so raw.

In a news conference he seemed, like Prince Hamlet, to rove the stage soliloquising on his failure. Hamlet surely was Shakespeare musing on what happened when a modern renaissance man ended up in an old-fashioned revenge tragedy.

Thinking too precisely on the event, Obama concluded he had lost hold of the narrative. For a man who first intended to be a novelist - the only politician to create his own narrative even before he sought office - it was a sobering analysis, but accurate.

Start Quote

Perhaps he has found his groove. Perhaps I've just got used to his style”

End Quote

Take the stimulus money. He wanted a "moonshot" - a symbolic high profile project, that would make America proud of the whole policy. Their step to the stars?

Green energy. Immersed in detail, he forgot the big picture.

Obama now dismissively calls Romney "a salesman". But a politician needs to be able to go door-to-door with their wares.

This is why the first debate was such a defining moment. Rarely does a single event loom so large in an election. If Obama had lost, those 90 minutes would have been blamed.

It mattered, not because Obama lost and Romney won - as if it was some arm-wrestling contest - but because of what it seemed to show.

But more than that - even supporters saw in Obama a lack they had long feared. He was hardly present, let alone presidential. He was dully dutiful, devoid of zest, zeal or zing.

Barack and Michelle Obama at their inauguration ball in January 2009 That was then: four years ago on the night of Obama's inauguration

His book, subtitled "reclaiming the American dream", was called The Audacity of Hope. And "audacity" means - according to my dictionary - intrepid, daring, adventurous, recklessly bold, marked by originality and verve.

Were the president of that debate to a write a book, it might be entitled The Aloofness of Lowered Expectations.

But there has been another vital moment in this election campaign - the moment Obama came off the trails to deal with the ravages of the great storm.

It could be seen as the moment he won the election. A president in a raincoat, rather alone, coming down the steps of Air Force One, walking tall through the lashing rain.

By stopping campaigning, he killed Romney's momentum and looked like a chief in command. Perhaps he has found his groove. Perhaps I've just got used to his style.

After cancelling a rally, President Obama walks through the driving rain

For somebody who can be an amazing orator, Obama can also be a really dull one.

For the last few days of campaigning, he really pulled out all the stops and his victory rally was a classic.

Start Quote

I often feel that Obama is in office out of a burdensome sense of duty, not a selfish zest for the job”

End Quote

When he takes on the cadences of a black preacher you know he is fired up and ready to go. But at other times he can be as unpersuasive and uninspired as a long-winded professor in love with the sound of his own voice.

I'm tempted to say he can be lazy, but I doubt that it is that simple. Perhaps he just gets tired of the rather forced passion play that is the lot of a democratic leader, and believes too much in the force of rational argument.

Here's the problem. Whether it's Sandy, or the Gulf, or the economy, in a complex modern world acting as a co-ordinator, allowing experts to do their job, may be the most grown-up and effective way of dealing with problems.

I often feel that Obama is in office out of a burdensome sense of duty, not a selfish zest for the job. He is self-confident, which is not unusual in a senior politician.

But he's also self-contained and balanced. He's the polar opposite of Bill Clinton.

He lacks the driving need to be loved, the craving to excel, the desperation for the warmth of human contact that compels Clinton to be a far better practitioner of the art of politics.

Many Americans like to see the guy in the saddle, riding herd on a crisis, corralling it into some sort of shape and sense.

People learn. Sometimes they learn just in time.

Mark Mardell Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell Presenter, The World This Weekend

Trident question comes to the surface

In 2016, the new government will have to decide whether to continue to invest in the Trident programme - and this could be a key issue in a hung Parliament, says the BBC's Mark Mardell.

Read full article

More on This Story

US Presidential Election 2012


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 997.

    992 AndreaNY
    ‘Why people keep expecting O to change when it comes to fiscal responsibility is beyond me. Structural economic problems are beyond his capabilities’

    That's it Andrea. You just keep on campaigning for your hero, Mittens. One day soon the electorate will realise the error of their ways and see you were right all along. Romney/Ryan in 2016! And when they lose again – 2020!

  • rate this

    Comment number 996.

    All could belong
    Property law 2-edged
    Don't think public servants push-overs
    Best settle

    Some kids 'above study', work 'enough to take-over from Dad'

    Non-business families, able head for profession, science, art, life-times of study, teaching, service

    Those who went for commerce, less able, some rise, most 'bump along', laughing in booms, grumbling in busts

    Players, ALL needed

  • rate this

    Comment number 995.

    AndreaNY@992"End of story."

    If that's true Andrea, why continue to get so worked up about it? Are you going to spend the next 4 years with churning bowels and non-stop bitterness?

    Why not get to work and help bring some constructive common sense back to the GOP? Better that than what you're doing. We already know who -- and what -- you are. Time for you to grow a little, isn't it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 994.

    Over-taxing the rich is biting the hand that feeds you.

    The Trumps & Kennedys won’t be worried – super-rich can afford good tax lawyers. The extra taxes will hit local restaurant owners, family doctors, dentists & other supposedly “evil rich people”.

    Obama peddles the politics of envy, without funds to bail out those to whom he owes big political debts. It will all end in tears.

  • rate this

    Comment number 993.

    ref #957
    Simple math. More tax revenue means less need to cut entitlements. Rich pay more, as they can afford to, so poor are not totally in the weeds
    Lets look at CA where they have just passed a question which will raise taxes to pay for the goverment. Why don't goverment workers take a major cut to pay their fair share.


Comments 5 of 997


Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.