Are Republicans the 'stupid party'?

 
Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal speaks to guests at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Rosemont, Illinois 8 June 2012 Jindal's critique: Avoid 'sideshows' but don't change principles

Related Stories

Bobby Jindal is warning that the Republicans must stop being the "stupid party".

The Louisiana governor, a likely contender for his party's presidential nomination in 2016, said a number of Republicans had "damaged the brand" by making "offensive and bizarre" comments.

He's talking of course about those remarks about "legitimate rape" and how rape can't lead to pregnancy.

The Republicans who made those comments did seem to be going out of their way to back up John Stuart Mill's 1866 comment: "I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative. I believe that is so obviously and universally admitted a principle that I hardly think any gentleman will deny it."

OK. That's the headline grabber. But it is hardly a revelation to point out that those who make weird noises during an election campaign should shut up.

Jindal's prescription

So it is worth looking at Gov Jindal's prescription in full. It is, after all, among the first contributions from a big name of the Republican party on how not to go down to defeat for a third time in a row.

Start Quote

If he is identifying [House Republicans] as a major part of the party's image problem, he is right, but he's not pointing a way out of their complex dilemma”

End Quote

He's adamant the party shouldn't change its principles. Not on taxation or big government, of course. But not on abortion or gay marriage either.

He rejects Mr Romney's apparent contention that 47% of voters were out of reach for Republicans, which was always, when you think about it, a counsel of despair.

Gov Jindal identifies a core Republican problem: they are overwhelmingly white in a country that is becoming more of a melting pot day by day.

"We must reject the notion that demography is destiny, the pathetic and simplistic notion that skin pigmentation dictates voter behaviour," he said.

He's a good person to say this. His parents came to the US from India in 1970. It says a lot about the way America has changed that he has become the governor of a state that resisted civil rights and defended segregation to the bitter end.

I don't want to underplay how important that is - but his speech doesn't say how Republicans can reach the fastest growing ethnic group - Latinos - without shifting their stance on immigration reform.

Moreover, I am puzzled by what appears to be the core of his message. He rejects big government - but also seems to reject the fights about it in Washington.

'Sideshows'

He calls not only the debates about gun control, but also those on the fiscal cliff and debt ceiling "sideshows".

"These are in reality sideshows in Washington that we have allowed to take centre stage in our country - and as conservatives, we are falling into the sideshow trap," he said.

This is not an isolated point.

"We seem to have an obsession with government bookkeeping," he says. "We as Republicans have to accept that government number crunching - even conservative number crunching - is not the answer to our nation's problems."

Of course he's underscoring an inherent irony in conservatism - those politicians who dislike government put all their time and effort and will and money into becoming part of the government, so they can do away with much of it.

Inevitably, they rather like being part of it, and stick around for years trying to slim down something they disapprove of, fanatical dieters insisting on eating at the best restaurants so they can better control the portion sizes.

It is an irony, in that one can chuckle about it, but it is not a paradox. It is, I would have thought, pretty essential for conservatives who want to control government spending to have control of that government.

His argument seems to be that Republicans should spend their time encouraging the "real economy" and leaving it up to the states to spend what little public money he deems necessary.

Maybe this is merely a coded attack on those Republicans in the House of Representatives, who seem to think they won the election.

If he is identifying them as a major part of the party's image problem, he is right, but he's not pointing a way out of their complex dilemma - the choice between being quislings to faithful Republicans or obstructionists in the mind of most Americans.

So an "A" for effort, grabbing headlines, and identifying the obvious, but a "C" for a rather confused economic approach, which looks more like a desire to say something jolting than a serious contribution.

I'm looking forward to hearing Florida Senator Marco Rubio, and, even more, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, describe the way ahead.

But Gov Jindal has made a start confronting his shocked, and rather complacent, party.

 
Mark Mardell Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell Presenter, The World This Weekend

Is Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy about to bring back Blairism?

Those on the left think new Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy could be about to take the party back to the days of Tony Blair, says the BBC's Mark Mardell.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 318.

    Thankfully there are more than just two parties. If one felt the Republicans had become "stupid" but was not left-leaning there is always the Libertarian party. If someone else decided the Democrats only paid lip service to the environment, there is always the Green party. In the US, one can vote for what they actually believe in rather than what they are told to believe in.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 317.

    312 Stupid as Gore and Hart were, my vote for stupidest goes to President Wilson as the worst ever.Not only was he first in over a century to ignore Washington's warning to stay out of military alliances and foreign affairs especially European intrigues but his advocacy of Prohibition led directly to the Sicilian Mafia getting a permanent foothold in the US.We've paid for those mistakes ever since

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 316.

    In Canada, our governing Conservative Party often clearly shows that the Republicans are their ideal. However, as of last year, we have finally broken the 2-party system myth - why aren't other parties coming more to the fore in the US, given that the choice now seems to be between Stupid and Ahem-well-not-stupid-but-not-doing-nearly-enough?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 315.

    @311.MagicKirin

    Obama "least qualified" ??

    so Johnson, G W Bush, Nixon, Ford were better?

    Can we go as far back as Hoover?

    general rule is not to feed trolls, but sometimes its fun to watch feeding time ...

    no aggro here, I've decided to treat all your comments as humour, keep it up.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 314.

    The very definition of STUPID lies at the 1 minute and 50 second (1:50) point of the following video. Educate yourselves.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E48QqcTOXeY

 

Comments 5 of 318

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • BBC CultureBest of 2014

    BBC Culture weighs in on the ten most important blockbusters of the year

Programmes

  • HoverboardClick Watch

    Testing the hoverboard's magnetic levitation - but will it ever replace the bicycle?

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.