Sequester: When budget cuts are a matter of life and death

 
US aircraft carriers are pictured in port at at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia With a naval facility and Nato base, the defence industry is key to Virginia's economy

Related Stories

Mark Stets warns the cuts around the corner are a matter of life and death.

Residents of Virginia Beach, Virginia, are used to a sense of mortality - it has the highest concentration of serving and retired military in the US.

During a packed public meeting at a hotel ballroom in this coastal resort, many warned of the damage from the automatic cuts to local businesses, to their families and to America's prestige.

But retired naval Chief Petty Officer Stets says much more is at stake. He speaks with quiet assurance, but you can tell his voice is one degree away from cracking. No wonder.

He starts his question to the lawmakers on the platform with the simple statement that his son, a soldier, was killed in Pakistan in 2010.

"My worry is there is another family that is going to suffer the loss that I did because their son didn't have the proper training, the proper armament, the proper munitions to do his job," he later tells me.

"Sequestration is going to take 10% off our military budget and, as I look at it, out of a group of 10 soldiers, one doesn't have a helmet, one doesn't have body armour, one doesn't have a radio. Each man in that platoon doesn't have something to do his job."

'Devastating cuts'

I have no idea if he is right or wrong. The Pentagon has warned automatic cuts of 10% would be "devastating", without spelling out what would happen. But there are already plans for defence workers to take one day off a week without pay.

Part of the problem with the automatic cuts, known by the ugly term "the sequester" is that no-one can say exactly what they would mean in practice, even though they are only days away.

The White House has set out the threatened impact on Virginia, as well as the other 49 states, ahead of President Barack Obama's visit to a Virginia shipyard.

Mr Obama is out campaigning against the cuts, warning that Congress must avoid wounding the recovery.

We are talking here about the can that was kicked down the road at New Year, when Congress did a deal to avoid automatic tax increases.

But they put off automatic spending cuts for two months. That deadline is almost up. The whole idea was meant to concentrate minds.

'Hang that name'

Here is the theory: Democrats would hate the savaging of social programmes; Republicans would loathe the harsh reductions of military spending. So they would be forced to come together and find more sensible ways to reduce public spending.

Cunning, eh? Only it has not worked. That is partly because some Republicans think bad cuts are better than no cuts at all.

There is a sense of complacency on Capitol Hill that is totally lacking in Virginia Beach.

Most people in Washington think Friday's deadline will come and go, but a deal will be done in a week or two.

CPO Stets says that is unacceptable.

"To me the next soldier that dies, if sequestration goes into effect, lies on every member of Congress - and the president."

"There is no way they'll get past me. I will hang that name on them."

 
Mark Mardell Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell Presenter, The World This Weekend

Is Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy about to bring back Blairism?

Those on the left think new Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy could be about to take the party back to the days of Tony Blair, says the BBC's Mark Mardell.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 245.

    @244. SilverTusk – “There’s a long way to go, but it’s a start.”

    I don’t mind how long the journey is, and I suspect there will be twists and turns long the way, just so long as the destination is in the opposite direction the Greeks took!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 244.

    @243.centromere – “Where do you stand on the issue?”

    Like most people, I suspect; disappointed that they were not up to the challenge of specific cuts, but took the “across the board” easy way out.

    Still, it’s a start. There’s a long way to go, but it’s a start.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 243.

    @242.SilverTusk – “When you are willing to discuss the topic, sequestration, we might have a discussion.”

    Where do you stand on the issue?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 242.

    @241 - All for All - "Not to admit implicit choice"

    You know what the topic is - sequestration - and you refuse to discuss it. When you are willing to discuss the topic, sequestration, we might have a discussion. Until you return to the topic, there is little purpose in engaging with you.

    Good luck!

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 241.

    centromere @239
    "a long-winded way"
    Not to admit implicit choice

    The money 'you' want - that the USA needs - to pay down external debt, is in the hands of your 'wealth concentrators', almost laughably 'your leaders'

    The money 'you' - as middle & poor America - owe to the 1%, is down to long compounded mix of greed & duress, proportions varying but whole morass fraudulent

    Equality to be offered

 

Comments 5 of 245

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • BooksHidden messages

    Adults often find surprising subtexts in children’s literature – but are they really there?

Programmes

  • Stephen Sackur with Status Quo's Francis RossiHARDtalk Watch

    Watch extracts of some of Stephen Sackur's best interviews from 2014

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.