Senate's Syria motion does not preclude 'mission creep'

Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Sen. Robert Menendez, left, confers with committee member Sen. Barbara Boxer, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, 3 September, 2013. Senators Robert Menendez and Barbara Boxer confer during a hearing on intervention in Syria

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will probably win the race to come up with the first resolution on Syria from Congress. Its two leading Democratic and Republican members have agreed a wording which binds the president's hands.

It limits military action to 60 days and rules out combat troops on the ground. President Barack Obama may not be too unhappy with it. It uses his own words, such as "tailored" and "limited" action.

No-one to whom I've spoken thought action would last two months, and President Obama and his generals don't want boots on the ground.

But in his testimony, Secretary of State John Kerry demonstrated to some who are cautious about action why this sort of language is necessary. He mused that if Syria imploded, special forces might have to go in and secure chemical weapons.

The language of the draft doesn't forbid that, but it does show mission creep is possible. I've never understood myself why securing the chemical weapons is not America's main priority.

But that's beside the point. If the president is not unhappy with this first motion, some who want deeper and more serious involvement, aimed at toppling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, may be.

There's still a lot of reluctance on Capitol Hill. Many doubts are backed up by the mood in America. A new poll indicates a big majority against action.

However cautious the senators' motion, they would still be authorising something the American public don't want to happen.

Mark Mardell Article written by Mark Mardell Mark Mardell Presenter, The World This Weekend

Trident question comes to the surface

In 2016, the new government will have to decide whether to continue to invest in the Trident programme - and this could be a key issue in a hung Parliament, says the BBC's Mark Mardell.

Read full article

More on This Story

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

  • KnucklesGood or bad?

    For many it can be very satisfying to 'crack' the bones in your hand, but is it bad for you?


  • BatteriesClick Watch

    More power to your phone - the lithium-ion batteries that could last twice as long

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.