Abercrombie and Fitch 'wrongly fired' Muslim over headscarf

Customers leave an Abercrombie and Fitch store at South Park mall in Charlotte, North Carolina 25 Novermber 20111 Abercrombie and Fitch employees testified it would cause "undue hardship" to accommodate Ms Khan

Related Stories

US clothing retailer Abercrombie and Fitch wrongly fired a Muslim worker for wearing a headscarf, a judge has ruled.

Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled the firm violated anti-discrimination laws when it sacked Hani Khan from a Hollister brand shop.

Ms Khan was initially allowed to wear a scarf in Hollister colours at the San Mateo, California shop but was told remove it and fired when she refused.

The retailer had argued deviation from its "look policy" would affect sales.

But Judge Rogers of the Northern District of California said Abercrombie and Fitch had not proven it faced undue hardship to accommodate employees who wear headscarves for religious reasons.

The lawsuit, brought by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, now goes to a trial on 30 September where a jury will determine damages.

No 'undue hardship'

Ms Khan had initially been hired at Hollister, a store under Abercrombie and Fitch's corporate umbrella, with the understanding she would be able to wear her headscarf to work, according to court records.

But four months into her employment, a district manager suspended her with pay after Ms Khan refused to take off the covering. She was later fired.

Her lawyers argued that there had been no complaints about Ms Khan's performance at work.

"I was shocked and surprised when I was asked to remove my hijab [headscarf] and then fired for refusing to comply," Ms Khan said in a statement.

In her ruling, Judge Rogers said Abercrombie and Fitch's lawyers had only offered "unsubstantiated opinion testimony of its own employees to support its claim of undue hardship" and had undercut its own argument by offering to rehire Ms Khan with her headscarf.

Ms Khan was supported by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

A spokeswoman said the organisation hoped the lawsuit would push the company to change its policies and clarify religious accommodations.

"At the heart of this case is the belief that no-one should ever have to choose between their religion and work," said Zahra Billoo of CAIR's San Francisco office.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More US & Canada stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on the BBC

Programmes

  • Stranded shipThe Travel Show Watch

    Stranded in the icy Northwest Passage where only the polar bears move freely

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.