US defence chief Chuck Hagel defends Bowe Bergdahl swap

Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel arrives on Capitol Hill in Washington, 11 June 2014 Hagel said Congress had been informed of previous negotiations involving the Guantanamo Bay detainees

Related Stories

US defence secretary Chuck Hagel has defended the Obama administration's swap of Sgt Bowe Bergdahl for five Guantanamo Bay detainees.

Mr Hagel told a House panel the deal was "a tough call" by the president "but I support it and stand by it".

The White House has been criticised by Republicans and some Democrats over the swap late last month.

They object to not being warned of the deal and say the detainees are too dangerous to free.

"We've made America less safe, here and around the world," House Speaker John Boehner said on Tuesday. "And we're going to pay for this."

Mr Hagel appeared before the House Armed Services committee on Wednesday as part of a two-part briefing with both unclassified and classified sections.

"The president and I would not have moved forward unless we had complete confidence that we were acting lawfully, in the national interest, and in the best traditions of our military," Mr Hagel said.

He said Sgt Bergdahl's deteriorating health, as well as a warning from Qatar that "time was not on our side", made military officials move fast.

A US Army photograph of Bowe Bergdahl. Sgt Bowe Bergdahl went missing in June 2009 and was the Taliban's only US prisoner of war
Signs of support with images of U.S. Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl are displayed outside Zaney"s coffee shop in Hailey, Idaho in this file photo taken May 31 Bergdahl's hometown of Hailey, Idaho, cancelled a homecoming event amid security fears

"We believed this exchange was our last, best opportunity to free him," said Mr Hagel, a Vietnam War veteran.

The defence secretary also said he and other national security officials were not "under any illusions about these five detainees" but said they were "appropriate" to release because the US had no basis to charge them with a crime.

They were "enemy belligerents"' but had not been implicated in any attacks against the US, he told the panel.

"And if any of these detainees ever try to rejoin the fight, they would be doing so at their own peril."

Sgt Bergdahl had been held captive since 2009. The Taliban officials had been at Guantanamo for more than a decade. Under the deal, they have to remain in Qatar for a year.

But some in Congress have harshly criticised the move.

Chuck Hagel discusses the Bergdahl transfer with the BBC

In his opening statement the top Republican on the committee, Buck McKeon said the administration had made "a clear violation" of a law requiring 30-day notification of any Guantanamo prisoner release.

"This transfer sets a dangerous precedent in negotiating with terrorists," Mr McKeon said.

"It reverses longstanding US policy and could incentivise other terrorist organisations, including al-Qaeda, to increase their use of kidnappings of US personnel."

Mr Hagel responded to that charge by saying any leak would have scuppered the deal.

Sgt Bergdahl is currently in a US military hospital in Germany.

More on This Story

Related Stories

More US & Canada stories

RSS

Features & Analysis

  • Baby in boxStrange case

    The remarkable appeal of the Finnish baby boxes


  • WW1 gas mask being demonstratedTrench terror

    Did the soldiers of WW1 have an irrational fear of poison gas?


  • Mitt Romney, speaks at the podium as he concedes the presidency during Mitt Romney's campaign election night event at the Boston Convention 7 November 2012Aura of a loser?

    Mitt Romney looked presidential but could never pull it off


  • A woman holds up a feminist sign.PC virus

    Is liberal speech policing out of control?


Elsewhere on the BBC

  • ReadingBest books

    BBC Culture takes a look at ten books you should read in February

Programmes

  • A car being driven by Cruise Automation technologyClick Watch

    The tech which could allow any car with an automatic gearbox to become self-driving

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.