It is important to estimate the number of organisms in a population to better understand the relationships in a community. This information is useful for monitoring the impact of conservation projects that aim to conserve endangered species or habitats. It is almost always impossible to count all of the organisms in a population. So we look at a small section of a population to draw conclusions about the rest. This process is called sampling and the area or part of population looked at is called a sample.
When sampling a population, the numbers of organisms are counted within a sample site, and then the results multiplied to estimate the total number in the entire habitat. Large animals and plants can often simply be counted. However, many smaller animals like insects and smaller mammals need to be trapped first so they can be counted and then released afterwards. Pitfall traps are small traps dug into the ground, which often has food inside to attract small mammals. The sides of these traps are smooth to stop the mammals escaping.
Another method is to use large nets to sweep through grasses or leaves of trees in a process called sweep netting. To catch aquatic organism nets are often held downstream of an area of river bed which is then gently disturbed by the person doing the sampling. The small animals float into the net. This is called kick-sampling.
Pooters are small devices used when sampling to suck up small insects safely without them going into your mouth.
Quadrats are square frames of wire usually 0.25 m2. These are placed on the ground to look at the plants or slow-moving animals within them. When looking at plants in a quadrat the following sampling can be used:
Random sampling using a quadrat involves the placing of quadrats at random coordinates. Regardless of whether you are investigating the number of individual species, the species diversity or the percentage cover in different areas you would use random sampling.
Most sampling is random, but systematic sampling can be used if there is a trend or pattern across the habitat, such as distance up a beach, or altitude on a hillside. If you are using the wrong kind of sampling method for your experiment, this can lead to biased results.
Sometimes we want to see if the number of species or percentage cover changes within an area. This is often as a result of a change in an abiotic factor.
An example of this is an investigation into whether the growth of seaweed depends upon the distance it is found on the seashore from the tide. As we are looking to link a linear change (in this case the number of hours the seaweed is covered by the tide) we would use systematic sampling.
A quadrat could be placed at regular distances, for example every five metres, along an imaginary line called a transect, which would run down the shore. Systematic sampling would be used along the transect to link changes in species to abiotic factors, such as immersion by water, temperature fluctuations, light intensity, all of which are influenced by the tide.
The results from transects can be drawn into kite diagrams. The width of the bar from the middle at any distance shows how many individuals were observed at that point.
In the example above, the distribution of dandelion plants gradually changes from 5 m to 20 m along the transect. A change in the distribution of species across a habitat is called zonation. It can happen because of a change in an abiotic factor.
At what distances were the most grasses and dandelions seen?
The most grasses were seen at 20 metres. The most dandelions were seen at five metres.