US & Canada

Are US child migrant detainees entitled to soap and beds?

Migrants are gathered inside the fence of a makeshift detention center in El Paso, Texas on Wed. March 27, 2019 Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption Migrants inside the fence of a makeshift detention center in El Paso, Texas

A Trump administration lawyer has disputed in court whether detained migrant children are entitled to toothbrushes and soap.

The Department of Justice argued the government was adhering to a landmark ruling requiring migrants to be kept in "safe and sanitary" facilities.

The attorney pointed out the law did not mention soap.

But a panel of judges in California questioned the rationale, saying the children were sleeping on concrete.

In July 2017, US District Judge Dolly Gee found the Trump administration had breached the 1997 Flores agreement by not providing migrant children with appropriate food or hygienic supplies, housing them in cold facilities without beds.

The agreement states that immigrant children cannot be held for more than 20 days and must be provided with food, water, emergency medical care and toilets.

But Department of Justice lawyer Sarah Fabian argued on Tuesday that the federal government had not violated Flores.

Image copyright US Customs and Border Protection
Image caption This 2018 image from the US Customs and Border Protection shows the foil blankets given to children

Ms Fabian maintained in a Ninth Circuit court in San Francisco that the government had fulfilled the Flores agreement because it did not specifically list items such as soap or toothbrushes.

"One has to assume it was left that way and not enumerated by the parties because either the parties couldn't reach agreement on how to enumerate that or it was left to the agencies to determine," she said, Courthouse News reported.

"These are the challenges of interpreting a very old agreement."

Ms Fabian argued that children in shorter-term immigration detention did not require soap or toothbrushes.

Circuit Judge William Fletcher questioned the government's reasoning.

"Are you arguing seriously that you do not read the agreement as requiring you to do anything other than what I just described: cold all night long, lights on all night long, sleeping on concrete and you've got an aluminium foil blanket?"

He added that it was "inconceivable" that the government would describe those conditions as "safe and sanitary".

Fellow Judge A Wallace Tashima remarked: "It's within everybody's common understanding that if you don't have a toothbrush, you don't have soap, you don't have a blanket, those are not safe and sanitary [conditions]."

Ms Fabian agreed "there's fair reason to find that those things may be part of safe and sanitary" conditions, but said the Flores agreement was "vague".

Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionThe cost of detention v the alternatives

The hearing comes on the heels of a bitter debate sparked by Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who called US-Mexico border migrant detention centres "concentration camps".

Ms Ocasio-Cortez said on Instagram on Monday: "The fact that concentrations camps are now an institutionalised practice in the Home of the Free is extraordinarily disturbing and we need to do something about it."

The New York Democrat emphasised that she was not comparing them to Nazi death camps.

She likened them instead to US Japanese internment camps during World War Two.

Ms Ocasio-Cortez was supported by actor George Takei, who was sent to such a camp with his family.

Acting Director of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Mark Morgan criticised this characterisation of the centres as "completely inappropriate", "reckless" and "flat out wrong".

Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney of Wyoming also lashed out at Ms Ocasio-Cortez, saying the comparison was demeaning to Holocaust victims.

Ms Ocasio-Cortez fired back by asking: "What do YOU call building mass camps of people being detained without a trial?"

Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionFive numbers that explain why the current US border crisis is different

Thousands of Central American migrants have been seeking asylum in the US, fleeing extreme poverty and insecurity.

US immigration authorities made a total of 396,579 apprehensions on the south-western border in 2018, and 303,916 the year before.

Border Patrol stations have become overcrowded and temporary shelters have been created in states such as Texas.

This month, the US reached an agreement with Mexico to help stem the flow of migrants by deploying Mexican National Guard troops to border regions.

More on this story