India v England: Joe Root and Matt Prior help tourists recover
Last updated on .From the section Cricket

Fourth Test, Nagpur, day one: |
England 199-5 (97 overs) |
Match scorecard |
Debutant Joe Root and Matt Prior led England's fightback against India on an attritional first day in Nagpur.
After winning the toss England slumped to 139-5 on a slow and low wicket, but Root (31 not out) and Prior (34 no) helped the tourists recover to 199-5.
Kevin Pietersen (73) and Jonathan Trott (44) earlier rescued England from 16-2 after Ishant Sharma dismissed Nick Compton (3) and Alastair Cook (1).
England lead India 2-1, needing a draw in this final Test to win the series.
The performance of Root, in particular, will encourage England, who drafted the 21-year-old Yorkshire opener in at number six to replace Samit Patel.
The youngster showed real maturity as he mixed stout defence with intelligent run-scoring - the Sheffield-born player looking strong on both sides of the wicket alongside Prior.
It was also another impressive, gritty display by Prior who once again displayed the responsibility which is now complementing his undoubted range of attacking shots in the middle order.
While India kept England in check with some tight bowling and an improved fielding display, England's batsmen may, with the exception of Cook who fell to a poor umpiring decision, rue poor shot selection.
Pietersen, in particular, might be disappointed with the manner of his dismissal after a superb innings which was a masterclass in dogged defence and sensible strokeplay until he holed out.
The 32-year-old, who registered his second slowest Test half-century in the 188-ball knock, chipped debutant all-rounder Ravindra Jadeja into the hands of short mid-wicket to leave England wobbling at 139-5, on a ground where the average first innings score is 397.
Pietersen had shown commendable restraint as he cut out the risky shots and, together with Trott in a watchful 86-run partnership, steadied England after a turbulent start.
Sharma, the sole pace bowler in the Indian team, did the early damage as Compton, who has been awarded an incremental contract by England, edged a short ball behind before Cook was given out leg before wicket - despite replays showing the ball might not have shaped in enough.
The ball certainly did enough for Trott's dismissal as the Warwickshire batsman, who looked in good touch, left one from Jadeja which drifted back in and hit off stump.
Ian Bell, who has struggled for runs throughout the tour, again failed as he chipped leg-spinner Piyush Chawla to short extra cover after scoring just one run in 28 balls.
It was another disappointing dismissal for 30-year-old Bell, who has now scored just 56 runs at an average of 14 in his three Tests on tour.
Once Pietersen followed, it appeared England were in danger of collapse until the assured intervention of Root and Prior.
With England's lower order also boosted by the return of Tim Bresnan in place of the injured Steven Finn, the tourists will hope to grind out further runs in their pursuit of a first series win in India since 1985.
Comments
Join the conversation
Compton is only 29! Most batsman play into their late 30's and normally improve their average between ages 30-35! I would say he has at least 5/6 more years left in him at the top of his game.
Did you know Mike Hussey didn't make his test debut until age 30. Look at him now, 37yrs old, test average of 50, 18 hundreds and 29 fifties to his name.
Frustrating to see KP bat that well and then...
-----------------------------------------
I would normally take the view about KP and his ego, but not in this case from the sounds of it he buckled down at the beginning got us back on track before he started to hit out...
That is why he's there. steady the ship if he has too, but then he's there to move the score on
Maybe if you tried to occasionally post a informative or balanced comment people would take you seriously. As it is most readers think of you as a joke.
Of course maybe being a troll is your thing and you get off on it.
Pretty sad
Finn is injured, he has a slipped disc in his back. Probably shouldn't rant about the selection in this case.
you missed the point...
That is why he's there. steady the ship if he has too, but once its steadied then he's there to move the score on.
hes there because in an explosive 15 minutes he can take the game away from the opposistion.
As long as he played himself in first, then its his job to strike out and play expansive shots even if he gets out doing it
Re Bell he's unquestionably a fabulous batsman when he gets it right, great to watch and hugely talented... but what a dreadful 2012 he's had.
I was under the impression it was India who needed a result. They can sit back and wait for mistakes all they like. They were lucky to get 5 wickets today. If they take the same sit and wait approach on day two I can see England batting past lunch and putting them under real time pressure.