Australia v India: Tourists need two wickets to win third Test in Melbourne
Last updated on .From the section Cricket
| Third Test, Melbourne (day four) |
| India 443-7 dec & 106-8 dec: Agarwal 42, Cummins 6-27 |
| Australia 151 & 258-8: Cummins 61*, S Marsh 44, Jadeja 3-82 |
| Australia need 141 more runs to win; India need two wickets |
| Scorecard |
India moved to within two wickets of victory in the third Test after Australia finished day four needing 141 more runs to win in Melbourne.
Australia were set 399 to win but following a top-order collapse, pace bowler Pat Cummins finished unbeaten on 61 to help the hosts reach 258-8.
Earlier, Cummins had taken a career-best 6-27 when India declared their second innings on 106-8 before lunch.
Victory for either side would earn them a 2-1 lead in the four-Test series.
India had begun the day on 54-5, a lead of 346, with Mayank Agarwal making his way to 42 but captain Virat Kohli declared immediately when wicketkeeper Rishabh Pant fell for 33.
Australia then lost both their openers inside 10 overs as Aaron Finch was caught by Kohli at second slip for three, and Marcus Harris was caught at short leg off Ravindra Jadeja for 13.
Left-arm spinner Jadeja later returned to dismiss the recalled Mitchell Marsh and keeper-captain Tim Paine to leave Australia relying on their lower order.
But Cummins kept the game alive, adding his highest Test innings to his best first-class bowling figures, resisting for 103 balls.
Though he lost Mitchell Starc for 18, Cummins and Nathan Lyon have added 43 for the ninth wicket in 14 overs to maintain hopes of an unlikely victory on day five.
The highest successful fourth-innings run chase at the MCG came in 1928, when England made 332-7.
Comments
Join the conversation
----
Can you send that again, and this time try and use English mate. I have read that five times and can't make head nor tail or it.
Thanks
To all these people posting negative comments about cricket please get some perspective and leave HYS to the real cricket fans, or rather comment on a football story much better suited to your poor attitudes.
After all they skittles out teams for years with their fast swing bowling.
I can only think it's down to global warming and climes change , atmospheric change ?
Thoughts please!
Loving this!
When England were getting regular kickings in the 70's and 80's cricket still survived.
At the moment it's England's turn to dish it out,but Australia will return sometime soon......maybe in this summers Ashes. I know it may be painful for you but you can't win all the time old boy.
Have a good 2019.
I'm sick of the clearly evident bias towards Australia, India & England in cricket. When you allocate certain nations with more importance, you only weaken Test cricket in general.
"We can hardly take the moral high ground here can we?"
Oh yes we can.
The Aussies chose to take an item onto the pitch with the sole purpose of illegally (and they knew it was illegal, no grey areas, no matter of argument) changing the condition of the ball.
They knew they were cheating and actively chose to cheat.
So EVERYONE else has the moral high ground.
Very few teams beat Australia in Australia. Well done India!