This entry is now closed for comments.
Your wrong Taffy. For one thing Pardew should be the last person to criticise anyone with his reputation. Fergie is right about something else. too. - Pardew just manages a little club from the North East
Yeah he's a Citeh fan. Used to be called goluboy which is Russian for light blue, as well as something else..... chortle. Hence me putting golubaby every now and then. Recently he's become the ultimate abu and if Chelsea threaten us more than Citeh I imagine he will switch allegiances very quickly. Also he never gets involved in convo, just keeps posting the rubbish you have seen yourself.
He'[s a city fan ? That..... thats just.......oh my. So his huge obsession with the game where Chelsea ended up with 9 men is even more inexplicable then.To paraphrase something I just heard "It seems your tongue has tasted sour grapes"
He's a Citeh fan Trigg, currently anyway. Will probably be a Chelsea fan in two weeks when they overtake them. How's that 'decline' of Utd looking Golubaby?!LOL!!!
MU 11 Players vs Chelsea 9 Just to go back to your point that United were hypocrites for something that didn't involve sendings off because Chelsea had 2 sent off I say this, isn't it more hypocritical to villify Fergie for ranting at a ref when your own teams staff and players burst into Clattenburgs dressing room making all sorts of threats and jostling him about ?Glasshouses pal
MU 11 Players vs Chelsea 9 Tell me you just didnt use the word 'kayfabe' lol I used to know the word Kayfabe when I was about 12, then I grew up and stopped watching men in spandex rolling around. Is your name Mark ?
@657 absolute comedy! season 2099? dont think we have quite got there yet... and liverpool have never been good enough to deserve a title win in the premiership era, hence why they dont have any!its amazing how people only see the few decisions that go uniteds way instead of the many that dont! on most occasions united are the ones with decisions against, but that doesnt matter as its united..
@666Oh we know sometimes its kayfabe. That's why Fergie's role is akin to that of Bobby Heenan. Managing 'unloved or unsavoury' characters and drawing heel heat for himself & his stable. ;)
Guys the hilarious thing is Ferguson is deliberately one eyed to serve a purpose, he chooses to take pressure off his team. Dont always agree but hey. Most of you on here have no purpose to serve and are just as bitter and just as one eyed. If you honestly believe that man utd have had an easy ride from officials this year then i think football isnt for you and i say that not as a man utd fan.
Why is Fergie not being hauled to task for berating the officials who made the right calls?So much so that the PL is being make a laughing stock with him criticizing our FA officials. & getting bestowed with a generous dollops of sending offs in MU's favour. Is it because if a MU player is being send off , MU 'myth' will be demolished?
663.MU 11 Players vs Chelsea 9 you need tablets or some sort of medication if your believe that drivel, if you want to blame anyone for spurs not being in the CL blame cfc they took there spot whuile we were well clear of both teams? did your mummy get you a new laptop for xmas? your rants are terrible, fergie is the root of all evil, united arent at all good, just very very lucky, right?
"Alan Pardew is the WORST for haranguing referees" forked tongued by Fergie . ROFLMAO.@657Yes Rafa was right to say (and there's merit in it) that Liverpool was robbed & that MU was gifted undeserving pointsLikewise Spurs was denied a CL spot, while MU (bestowed with a generous dollops of controversial points to gain entry) squandered by being dumped in a minnows' group last CL season.
660.nutgoneNo, the phrase is 'it's not cricket' - because that's a sport that, until recently, entailed the highest possible standards of personal integrity - money now being the problem blighting that game, as it has football.Football can only dream! But your targeting of SAF is off-beam; bad sportsmanship is endemic in football the world over.
657. BenCareful Ben - that's libel, is that. Though unless you're being malicious - surely not? - you probably don't have to worry, as the damages would only be limited to the financial loss incurred by your target - which would be nil, given that no one in their right mind takes all this conspiracy nonsense seriously.Check up from the neck up time, folks.
We're having some problems displaying the comments at the moment. Sorry. We're doing our best to fix it.
You must sign in to rate comments