MPs make plea to FA over Fifa 'sham' reform fears
Last updated on .From the section Football

British MPs are urging the English, Scottish and Welsh Football Associations to help stop the internal reform of Fifa from becoming a "sham".
A leading member of Fifa's Independent Governance Committee (IGC), Alexandra Wrage, said the reform process had been after several measures were rejected by the world governing body.
These measures included toughening up the process for deciding how future World Cups are awarded and disclosing how much Fifa president Sepp Blatter and other leading executives are paid.
Following Wrage's complaints, representatives from the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat parties have requested that the English, Scottish and Welsh FAs ensure some of the IGC's rejected proposals are discussed at Fifa's annual congress in May.
The deadline for national associations to add items to the agenda for the annual congress - where governance proposals are debated and voted on by all 209 member countries - is Saturday, 30 March.
Damian Collins and Alun Cairns (Conservative), Jim Sheridan (Labour) and Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrats) are the MPs who have made the requests. They have been joined by Conservative MEP Emma McClarkin.
In a letter to David Bernstein, the chairman of the English FA, Collins says he is "greatly concerned" that the IGC's recommendations do not look like being discussed at congress.
He urges Bernstein, who is due to stand down from the FA later this year, to follow up the "courageous stand" he took in 2011 when he spoke out against the unopposed re-election of Fifa president Sepp Blatter.
In his letter to FA chairman, Collins writes: "This was supposed to be the moment when Fifa embraced the need for greater transparency in its financial affairs and key decision-making processes.
"Instead the impression has been created that Sepp Blatter and the Fifa executive committee have no serious commitment to reform, and that the whole process has been a sham.
"According to Fifa statutes, any member may make a request for an item to be included on the agenda for the Congress, and I would like to ask if the FA would submit a proposal for the four key recommendations for reform recently presented by the Independent Governance Committee to be debated and voted on."
The letter says there should be "greater independent scrutiny of the work of the executive committee" and in particular of the decision on where should host World Cups.
In addition, it say members of the executive committee should disclose their salary and benefits, as well as declaring other financial interests.
Collins adds: "These issues are of real concern to football fans around the world. To many the Fifa executive committee look like a group of hard-faced men who have done very well out of football."
Comments
Join the conversation
What it actually needs is the Swiss government to grow a pair and supervise this organisation in based in their country.
This is FIFA we're talking about, of course it'll be a sham. Between Blatter and his messenger boy Platini, they've almost single-handedly destroyed the last remaining shards of dignity the game had.
If it wasn't a game loved by so many people, it would be laughable
FIFA are what i accused them of before, and like anything, before you can change something you need to all accept there is an issue. The BBC should allow this as it is a discussion on this story.
Will they, no, someone will block this just like my last 3.
But for some reason, they are left to plod on dragging the name of football through the mud. All they care about is their own financial gain rather than what's best for football.
Then again, the players also seem to put money before Country so they are just as bad....
Open a thread on Suarez, Terry or Ferdinand and you'll get countless comments from trolls, wums and the spectacularly stupid.
Afford people the opportunity to address some of the most important issues about how football is governed and no one seems to have anything to say.
If it is a private company not borrowing money or have any stakeholders at risk, then yes they should be able to do what they want.
When it is an association of this magnitude it should have the best corporate governance possible, FIFA have the same level of governance as my local newsagent. That is what is wrong. Billions of pounds floating around and no controls!
5 MINUTES AGO
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules
ABSOLUTE JOKE that this was removed. For the record mate, I 100% agreed with what you said. Freedom of speech - not any more.
http://ww3.economist.com/news/americas/21573977-another-fifa-scandal-bonus-money
Rotten to the core are FIFA. We, the consumer, are standing by and watching whilst these 'executives' are lining their pockets. Disgrace.
Why are an organisation who are big enough to transform the future landscape of a single country (ie Qatar) allowed to be almost blatantly corrupt?
I would leave to see a mass protest organised against everything thats bad about football....funnily enough almost all aspects are related to money
its all about money and we are talking big time money going into FIFA cronies.
we are actually playing into their hands by watching professional and international matches as we pay for these players, clubs, federations and FIFA talking about multi-level marketing
best we go watch primary school football matches which are not under FIFA jurisdiction
what can MPs do???