This entry is now closed for comments.
People here cricticize big spending owners lika RA , but again, again and again I'll have to repeat , no money , no cups or championships or anything .... Just name one team that has become a champion without spending lots of money .. this is the equation More money = best players = championships
Plastic mancs getting worked up again I see.Never mind you have Moyes now to steady the ship. ROFPMSLLiverpool fans living in the dark ages & wallowing in their Istory
The side bar about how much Abramovich has spent on transfers tells the entire story of what is wrong with Football. Chelsea Football club are in a false position. The success the team has had is not Chelsea's success, it's only Abramovich's. Say what you want about Man United, but they have earned every penny they have ever spent on players.
This comment was removed because it broke the house rules. Explain
i wonder what puts RA off talking to the filthy drunken lying scum that attempts to pass themselves off as sports journalists in the UK ?*******505. Tis Me extremely limited intelligence ..!
In the 1970`s Chelsea was a proud club that could hold its head high, now its just a pathetic joke owned by a thief who`s only way of winning anything has been to pump his stolen millions into it.
The stats do not lie; 700m spent, 10 managers, can't fill a small stadium for CL even when they are the reigning champions = 11 trophies. Plastic club, plastic fans they will be a footnote in history much like Nottingham Forest. Joke club.
502I see an the usual hater drivel, sure.Mind, not quite sure how we can have been "given" all this money and then half rabid MU fans claim we have humungous debts. Little contradiction in the haters camp there, lol :).Meanwhile, our income has risen incredibly with CL & EL success, five new sponsors signed up in 2012 and the second largest fanbase of PL clubs. So we're laughing :).
LOL at CeltsYou must be right...Chelsea Football Club don't make any money....all the supporters go for free and the club refuse all of the TV and sponsorship revenue.......catch yerself on mate!
(Liverpool, Man U, Arsenal) made a lot of money, spent a lot of money.(Chelsea, Man City) given a lot of money, spent a lot of money.See the difference.
474 Munkeyfeet. Wherever those numbers come from they are wrong. If you need further evidence though,let's add the four times salary bill that Chelsea pay comparedt to Spurs (and many others). Bought, whichever way you look at it. 475 Expat. Of course you are right, but I remain amazed at how deluded fans of the two 'cuckoo clubs' are
We're having some problems displaying the comments at the moment. Sorry. We're doing our best to fix it.
You must sign in to rate comments