This entry is now closed for comments.
This comment was removed because it broke the house rules. Explain
1572.Blue Funk the FA found terry guilty after a court cleared him...they use different parameters for determining guilt...suarez was torn to pieces on here for diving countless times, and still is even though he's long gone, in the same way can any court prove he dived?
no independent commission could be sure it was his intention, because he was not looking at the victim, and there was no pull-back of the leg and ‘stamp.’ What he does is run on the player rather than stamp.
[Unsuitable URL removed by Moderator] Apologies, forgot the link of Costa playing frisbee with flem...1:17 & 1:40...[judge for yourself].Not going to be hypocritical & can't take the moral high ground with Suarez but Costa knew exactly what he was doing with Can & will continue in the same vein with his Fellaini elbows in the future.
@1572... Only Costa knows.. If it went through the legal system it could not be proven.
Wasnt a stamp. There was no pull-back of the leg and 'stamp'
Final thought ... if the Costa incident went through the legal system, do you think a lawyer would or would not be able to spin reasonable doubt into whether (or not) Costa intentionally stamped on Can?
Costa was stitched up by the FA, if it was a World Cup year and an English player would have committed stamps then they would have got leniency and yes the media has hyped this up but he did stamp on Can, he did deserve his punishment and he has got form of being a horrible character see 1:17 & 1:40 minutes...judge for yourself [I think El Hadji Diouf was a saint compared to our friend].
We're having some problems displaying the comments at the moment. Sorry. We're doing our best to fix it.
You must sign in to rate comments